Literature DB >> 7847647

The effects of organizational structure on primary care outcomes under managed care.

D A Barr1.   

Abstract

The advent of managed care in the United States brings with it more and larger organizations involved in providing primary care. Studies of organizations in general suggest that large managed care organizations will have difficulty providing high-quality primary care largely because of their complexity and the fragmentation of their work force. Existing data confirm that these organizations have shortcomings in both patient and physician satisfaction. There are few data to indicate whether such organizations can mitigate these problems by saving costs through economies of scale. To offset their inherent weaknesses, large primary care organizations need to ensure patients' accessibility to their physicians, the continuity of the physician-patient relationship, a care environment conducive to a high-quality physician-patient interaction, and the clinical autonomy of physicians. Much additional research needs to be done to further understand these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7847647     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  Beyond financial incentives: organizational ethics and organizational integrity.

Authors:  J Goodstein; R L Potter
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1999-12

2.  Does affiliation of physician groups with one another produce higher quality primary care?

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Kathryn L Coltin; Steven D Pearson; Ken P Kleinman; Jie Zheng; Janice A Singer; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Organizational structure and the delivery of primary care to older Americans.

Authors:  J S Zinn; V Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Will the future GP remain a personal doctor?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Career satisfaction and clinician-educators. The rewards and challenges of teaching. The Society of General Internal Medicine Career Satisfaction Study Group.

Authors:  M S Gerrity; D E Pathman; M Linzer; B D Steiner; L M Winterbottom; M C Sharp; S E Skochelak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A controlled time-series trial of clinical reminders: using computerized firm systems to make quality improvement research a routine part of mainstream practice.

Authors:  H I Goldberg; W E Neighbor; A D Cheadle; S D Ramsey; P Diehr; E Gore
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Doctor discontent. A comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997.

Authors:  A Murray; J E Montgomery; H Chang; W H Rogers; T Inui; D G Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study.

Authors:  M Linzer; T R Konrad; J Douglas; J E McMurray; D E Pathman; E S Williams; M D Schwartz; M Gerrity; W Scheckler; J A Bigby; E Rhodes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Race/ethnicity and patient satisfaction. Using the appropriate method to test for perceived differences in care.

Authors:  Donald A Barr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Implementing a new drug record system: a qualitative study of difficulties perceived by physicians and nurses.

Authors:  S E Andersen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.