Literature DB >> 7847436

Chronic fatigue: risk factors for symptom persistence in a 2 1/2-year follow-up study.

M R Clark1, W Katon, J Russo, P Kith, M Sintay, D Buchwald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prolonged disability of patients suffering from chronic fatigue may be due to sustaining factors that are independent of the cause and subject to intervention. This study reexamined a cohort of patients with chronic fatigue to define medical and psychiatric predictors of persistent symptoms.
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with chronic fatigue present for 6 months or more (not required to meet the Centers for Disease Control case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome [CFS]) completed a self-report, follow-up questionnaire to measure the overall improvement or worsening of their condition at a mean of 2.5 years after their initial examination. At the time of initial evaluation, patients underwent a structured psychiatric examination, physical examination, laboratory studies, and self-report measures of psychological distress and functional disability. The psychiatric examination queried the patient about 28 somatic symptoms that are separate from those associated with CFS. Discriminant analysis was used to determine which variables present at the initial examination were significant predictors of persistent symptoms and disability at 2.5 years.
RESULTS: The factors most important at the time of initial presentation in predicting persistent illness were: (1) more than eight medically unexplained physical symptoms separate from those associated with CFS case definition; (2) lifetime history of dysthymia; (3) duration of chronic fatigue symptoms greater than 1.5 years; (4) less than 16 years of formal education; and (5) age older than 38 years. None of the results of the initial physical examination, or immunologic, general laboratory, or viral antibody measurements were significant in predicting persistence of symptoms. Recovery rates for those who met the criteria for CFS by either of two case definitions were lower than the rate of noncases, but the differences were not statistically significant. The five aforementioned variables formed a significant discriminative function, correctly classifying 78% of those who recovered and 74% of those with persistent symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: At initial examination, patients with chronic fatigue, more than eight medically unexplained physical symptoms (excluding symptoms in the case criteria for CFS), a lifetime history of dysthymic disorder, longer than 1.5 years of chronic fatigue, less than 16 years of formal education, and who were older than 38 years were the most likely to have persistence of symptoms of chronic fatigue at the 2.5-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7847436     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80403-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  18 in total

Review 1.  Toward a model of social course in chronic illness: the example of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  N C Ware
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Chronic fatigue syndrome: the need for subtypes.

Authors:  Leonard A Jason; Karina Corradi; Susan Torres-Harding; Renee R Taylor; Caroline King
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study on the natural course.

Authors:  J H Vercoulen; C M Swanink; J F Fennis; J M Galama; J W van der Meer; G Bleijenberg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Use of exercise for treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  K K McCully; S A Sisto; B H Natelson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Chronic fatigue and minor psychiatric morbidity after viral meningitis: a controlled study.

Authors:  M Hotopf; N Noah; S Wessely
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Defining recovery in chronic fatigue syndrome: a critical review.

Authors:  Jenna L Adamowicz; Indre Caikauskaite; Fred Friedberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A natural history study of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Leonard A Jason; Nicole Porter; Jessica Hunnell; Abigail Brown; Alfred Rademaker; Judith A Richman
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2011-02

Review 8.  Neurobiological studies of fatigue.

Authors:  Mary E Harrington
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Distinguishing patients with chronic fatigue from those with chronic fatigue syndrome: a diagnostic study in UK primary care.

Authors:  L Darbishire; L Ridsdale; P T Seed
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Prediction of outcome in patients presenting with fatigue in primary care.

Authors:  Iris Nijrolder; Daniëlle van der Windt; Henriëtte van der Horst
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.