Literature DB >> 7846997

Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.

L J Layfield1, T D Wax, J G Lee, P B Cotton.   

Abstract

One hundred eight brushing cytology specimens with adequate follow-up were obtained from strictures of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The material was classified as benign, reactive, low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. A diagnosis of carcinoma was made in 18 patients, high grade dysplasia in 12, low grade dysplasia in 6 and benign, nonneoplastic in the remaining cases. The diagnostic sensitivity for carcinoma was 44%, with a specificity of 98%. Ten of 12 patients with high grade dysplasia demonstrated other evidence of carcinoma. No complications were encountered. Brushing cytodiagnosis of extrahepatic biliary and pancreatic duct strictures appears to be a safe procedure, with high specificity but only modest sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7846997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  19 in total

1.  Foreign body reaction to a metal clip causing a benign bile duct stricture 16 years after open cholecystectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  S Bayar; R Saxena; R R Salem
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Molecular diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies in brush cytologies of biliary strictures.

Authors:  T M Gress
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures.

Authors:  J C Mansfield; S M Griffin; V Wadehra; K Matthewson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: an expanding scope of possibility.

Authors:  Joel R Judah; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.

Authors:  Vaidehi Avadhani; Ezgi Hacihasanoglu; Bahar Memis; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Krisztina Z Hanley; Uma Krishnamurti; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Lauren M Daniels; Alexa A Freedman; Michael Goodman; Volkan Adsay; Michelle D Reid
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology.

Authors:  Lester J Layfield; Hormoz Ehya; Armando C Filie; Ralph H Hruban; Nirag Jhala; Loren Joseph; Philippe Vielh; Martha B Pitman
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.582

7.  Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases.

Authors:  C J Stewart; P R Mills; R Carter; J O'Donohue; G Fullarton; C W Imrie; W R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The role of cytology in the preoperative assessment and management of patients with pancreaticobiliary tract neoplasms.

Authors:  Judy C Pang; Rebecca M Minter; Richard S Kwon; Diane M Simeone; Michael H Roh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Early diagnosis of pancreatobiliary duct malignancies by brush cytology and biopsy.

Authors:  Gábor Elek; Tibor Gyökeres; Eszter Schäfer; Mária Burai; Ferenc Pintér; Akos Pap
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Needle biopsy for suspicious lesions of the head of the pancreas: pitfalls and implications for therapy.

Authors:  K M Itani; T V Taylor; L K Green
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.