Literature DB >> 11376018

Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases.

C J Stewart1, P R Mills, R Carter, J O'Donohue, G Fullarton, C W Imrie, W R Murray.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the accuracy of brush cytology in patients investigated for pancreatico-biliary strictures.
METHODS: All pancreatico-biliary brush cytology specimens submitted from two major teaching hospitals over a 6.5 year period were reviewed. Four hundred and forty eight satisfactory specimens from 406 patients with adequate clinical and/or pathological follow up data were examined in the study period.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty six patients (60.6%) were shown to have neoplastic strictures. One hundred and forty seven tumours were identified cytologically, including 87 of 146 pancreatic carcinomas, 29 of 47 cholangiocarcinomas, one of one bile duct adenoma, four of seven carcinomas of the gallbladder, eight of 13 ampullary carcinomas, two of three ampullary adenomas, 10 of 16 malignancies of undetermined origin, none of two islet cell tumours, one of three hepatocellular carcinomas, and five of eight metastatic tumours. The three adenomas identified on brush cytology could not be distinguished from adenocarcinoma morphologically. One hundred and sixty patients (39.4%) had benign strictures, most often as a result of chronic pancreatitis and bile duct stones. There were three false positive cytological diagnoses mainly as a result of the misinterpretation of cases with relatively scant and/or degenerative atypical epithelial cells. Forty one cases were reported as atypical or suspicious of malignancy on brush cytology, of which 29 were ultimately shown to have carcinoma. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 59.8% and 98.1%, respectively. The sensitivity increased from 44.3% in the initial third of cases to 70.7% in the final third of cases examined in the series.
CONCLUSIONS: Brush cytology, in conjunction with other clinical and radiological investigations, is a useful technique in the assessment of patients with suspected pancreatico-biliary neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376018      PMCID: PMC1731449          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.54.6.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals.

Authors:  R Logrono; D F Kurtycz; C P Molina; V A Trivedi; J Y Wong; K P Block
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis in bile duct brush cytology.

Authors:  C J Stewart; M R Stephen; R K Ferrier
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.582

3.  Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of duodenal, biliary, and ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  R H Bardales; M W Stanley; D D Simpson; S J Baker; C T Steele; R F Schaefer; C N Powers
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Diagnostic value of cytology for biliary stricture.

Authors:  T Kurzawinski; A Deery; B R Davidson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures.

Authors:  M Rabinovitz; A B Zajko; T Hassanein; B Shetty; K M Bron; R R Schade; J S Gavaler; G Block; D H Van Thiel; A Dekker
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Positive peritoneal cytology predicts unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  N B Merchant; K C Conlon; P Saigo; E Dougherty; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Combined use of brushing cytology and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the early detection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Y Sawada; H Gonda; Y Hayashida
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture.

Authors:  L A Desa; A B Akosa; S Lazzara; P Domizio; T Krausz; I S Benjamin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Brushing cytology in biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  M Rupp; C M Hawthorne; H Ehya
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

10.  Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies in brush cytologies of biliary strictures.

Authors:  T M Gress
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  [Interventions for benign biliary strictures].

Authors:  A Lubienski; M Duex; K Lubienski; J Blietz; G W Kauffmann; T Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.

Authors:  Laura E Moreno Luna; Benjamin Kipp; Kevin C Halling; Thomas J Sebo; Walter K Kremers; Lewis R Roberts; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Michael J Levy; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Unusual segmental stricture of the lower common bile duct mimicking bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Shuichiro Uchiyama; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Masahide Hiyoshi; Jiro Ohuchida; Masahiro Kai; Motoaki Nagano; Koki Nagaike; Kazuhiro Kondo; Yutaka Akiyama; Hiroaki Kataoka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology.

Authors:  Nasim Mahmoudi; Robert Enns; Jack Amar; Jaber AlAli; Eric Lam; Jennifer Telford
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: an expanding scope of possibility.

Authors:  Joel R Judah; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Application of brush cytology for FISH-based detection of 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumors.

Authors:  Irena Srebotnik-Kirbiš; Clara Limbäck-Stokin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography/Intraductal Ultrasound (ERC/IDUS) in Distinguishing Malignant from Benign Bile Duct Obstruction.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Yi Lu; Jia-Chuan Wu; Like Bie; Lu Xia; Biao Gong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Bile tract adenomyoma: a case report.

Authors:  Gui-Ming Shu; Yi-Jun Wang; Zhi Du; Dong-Yan Li; Chang-Li Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Todd H Baron; Amy C Clayton; Felicity B Enders; Christopher J Gostout; Kevin C Halling; Benjamin R Kipp; Bret T Petersen; Lewis R Roberts; Ashwin Rumalla; Thomas J Sebo; Mark D Topazian; Maurits J Wiersema; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.