Literature DB >> 7845558

Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements.

M A Goodale1, L S Jakobson, J M Keillor.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, we studied the differences between natural target-directed grasping movements and 'pantomimed' movements directed towards remembered objects. Although subjects continued to scale their hand opening for object size when pantomiming, grip formation and other kinematic variables differed significantly from those seen in normal target-directed actions. This was true whether the subjects had just seen the target object 2 sec before (Experiments 1 and 2) or whether the target object was still present and they were simply required to pantomime the grasping movement beside it (Experiment 3). We argued that these pantomimed reaches were being driven by stored perceptual information about the object, and were not utilizing the normal visuomotor control systems that direct actions in real time. This interpretation received strong support from observations of a patient with visual form agnosia who was also tested. In an earlier report, we had shown that this patient showed anticipatory scaling of her grasp despite her inability to discriminate between objects perceptually on the basis of size. The present study showed, however, that the requirement to remember an object even briefly, or to pantomime an action beside it, was enough to completely disrupt her visuomotor scaling (Experiments 2 and 3). That this reflected a failure of perception rather than imagery or understanding was supported by the fact that she could convincingly pantomime actions to imagined, familiar objects, the sizes of which were known to her (Experiment 4). All these results suggest that the mechanisms underlying the formation of perceptual representations of objects are quite independent of those mediating on-line visuomotor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7845558     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90100-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  96 in total

1.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1998-03

3.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Abstraction from a sensori-motor perspective: can we get a quick hold on simple perception?

Authors:  Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Susannah Murphy; Isla McKenna; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Naming and grasping common objects: a priming study.

Authors:  Camelia Garofeanu; Grzegorz Króliczak; Melvyn A Goodale; G Keith Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.

Authors:  Keira Ball; Daniel Smith; Amanda Ellison; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.