INTRODUCTION: In non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc), invasive mediastinal staging is typically used to guide treatment decision-making. Here, we present clinical practice guideline recommendations for invasive mediastinal staging in nsclc patients who have been staged T1-4, N0-3, with no distant metastases. METHODS: Draft recommendations were formulated based on the best available evidence gathered by a systematic review and a consensus of expert opinion. The draft recommendations underwent an internal review by clinical and methodology experts, and an external review by clinical practitioners through a survey assessing the clinical relevance and overall quality of the guideline. Feedback from the internal and external reviews was integrated into the clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: In general, most clinical experts agreed with the guideline, approving it for methodologic rigour. More than 80% of the surveyed practitioners gave it a high quality rating. The expert reviewers also provided written comments, with some of the suggested changes being incorporated into the final version of the guideline. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinical practice guideline, invasive mediastinal staging of nsclc is recommended in all cases except those involving patients with normal-sized lymph nodes, negative combine positron-emission tomography and computed tomography, and peripheral clinical stage 1A tumour. When performing mediastinoscopy, 5 nodal stations (2R/L, 4R/L, and 7) should routinely be examined.
INTRODUCTION: In non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc), invasive mediastinal staging is typically used to guide treatment decision-making. Here, we present clinical practice guideline recommendations for invasive mediastinal staging in nsclc patients who have been staged T1-4, N0-3, with no distant metastases. METHODS: Draft recommendations were formulated based on the best available evidence gathered by a systematic review and a consensus of expert opinion. The draft recommendations underwent an internal review by clinical and methodology experts, and an external review by clinical practitioners through a survey assessing the clinical relevance and overall quality of the guideline. Feedback from the internal and external reviews was integrated into the clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: In general, most clinical experts agreed with the guideline, approving it for methodologic rigour. More than 80% of the surveyed practitioners gave it a high quality rating. The expert reviewers also provided written comments, with some of the suggested changes being incorporated into the final version of the guideline. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinical practice guideline, invasive mediastinal staging of nsclc is recommended in all cases except those involving patients with normal-sized lymph nodes, negative combine positron-emission tomography and computed tomography, and peripheral clinical stage 1A tumour. When performing mediastinoscopy, 5 nodal stations (2R/L, 4R/L, and 7) should routinely be examined.
Entities:
Keywords:
Non-small-cell lung cancer; clinical practice guideline; mediastinal staging; nsclc
Authors: G P Browman; M N Levine; E A Mohide; R S Hayward; K I Pritchard; A Gafni; A Laupacis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G P Browman; T E Newman; E A Mohide; I D Graham; M N Levine; K I Pritchard; W K Evans; J A Maroun; D I Hodson; M S Carey; D H Cowan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frank C Detterbeck; Michael A Jantz; Michael Wallace; Johan Vansteenkiste; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Gerard A Silvestri; Michael K Gould; Mitchell L Margolis; Lynn T Tanoue; Douglas McCrory; Eric Toloza; Frank Detterbeck Journal: Chest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Paul De Leyn; Didier Lardinois; Paul E Van Schil; Ramon Rami-Porta; Bernward Passlick; Marcin Zielinski; David A Waller; Tony Lerut; Walter Weder Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Francys C Verdial; Kathleen S Berfield; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Joshua A Roth; David O Francis; Farhood Farjah Journal: Chest Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: M Smoragiewicz; J Laskin; D Wilson; K Ramsden; J Yee; S Lam; T Shaipanich; Y Zhai; C Ho Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Carmel Jacobs; Ian D Graham; Julie Makarski; Michaël Chassé; Dean Fergusson; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah Walters; Sara Benitez-Majano; Patrick Muller; Michel P Coleman; Claudia Allemani; John Butler; Mick Peake; Marianne Grønlie Guren; Bengt Glimelius; Stefan Bergström; Lars Påhlman; Bernard Rachet Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Milan Savic; Milica Kontic; Maja Ercegovac; Jelena Stojsic; Slavisa Bascarevic; Dejan Moskovljevic; Marko Kostic; Radomir Vesovic; Spasoje Popevic; Marija Laban; Jelena Markovic; Dragana Jovanovic Journal: Thorac Cancer Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 3.500