Literature DB >> 7844246

Increased cholecystectomy rates among Medicare patients after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

R P Nenner1, P J Imperato, C Rosenberg, E Ronberg.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken of Medicare claims coded for cholecystectomy and those coded for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the four year period 1990-1993 in New York State. During this time period there was a 28.12% increase in total cholecystectomies performed and an increase in the proportion of laparoscopic cholecystectomies from 15.86% to 50.0%. The increase in total cholecystectomies appears to be driven by a dramatic increase in laparoscopic procedures. Possible reasons for this increase include the performance of laparoscopy on patients previously assessed as too risky to undergo the conventional procedure, laparoscopy on mildly symptomatic patients who had previously put off a perceived higher risk open procedure and a possible broadening of indications for gallbladder surgery. The dramatic increase in the numbers of cholecystectomies performed in the early 1990s may be due in part to procedures performed on a large pool of procrastinating mildly symptomatic patients. If this is the case, then these increased rates should decline to baseline levels as soon as this pool of patients is exhausted. However, if surgeons are performing laparoscopy on asymptomatic patients with gallstones, then these rates may well be sustained. Such a broadening of indications for gallbladder surgery is of concern to many and has prompted the issuance of guidelines concerning the treatment of gallstones. Any broadening of indications for gallbladder surgery also has significant implications for health care costs and the use of health care resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7844246     DOI: 10.1007/bf02260323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  13 in total

Review 1.  The phenomenal growth of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review.

Authors:  R S Chung; T A Broughan
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Serious complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in New York State.

Authors:  R P Nenner; P J Imperato; C M Alcorn
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1992-05

3.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Questions patients should ask about laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R P Nenner; P J Imperato; T O Will
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Guidelines for the treatment of gallstones. American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Too much of a good thing?

Authors:  A K Diehl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The learning curve.

Authors:  R P Nenner; P J Imperato
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A P Legorreta; J H Silber; G N Costantino; R W Kobylinski; S L Zatz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The improving results of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Pickleman; R P González
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  The rise and fall of antireflux surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Yongliang Wei; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience.

Authors:  Vamsi V Alli; Jie Yang; Jianjin Xu; Andrew T Bates; Aurora D Pryor; Mark A Talamini; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Chronic acalculous cholecystitis: changes in patient demographics and evaluation since the advent of laparoscopy.

Authors:  K Jones-Monahan; J C Gruenberg
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Increased rate of cholecystectomies performed with doubtful or no indications after laparoscopy introduction: a single center experience.

Authors:  Elia Pulvirenti; Adriana Toro; Michel Gagner; Maurizio Mannino; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer.

Authors:  Laura M Stinton; Eldon A Shaffer
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Use of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether for the Treatment of Refractory Intrahepatic Biliary Strictures and Bile Casts: A Modern Perspective.

Authors:  Gregory Kim; Saninuj N Malayaman; Michael Stuart Green
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-07-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.