Literature DB >> 7842739

A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting.

J D Tucker1, W F Morgan, A A Awa, M Bauchinger, D Blakey, M N Cornforth, L G Littlefield, A T Natarajan, C Shasserre.   

Abstract

The advent of chromosome painting has brought the realization that structural aberrations can be far more complicated than previously imagined. Various investigators have devised their own nomenclature systems to deal with this difficulty, with the result that the terminology has become inconsistent and confusing. Recently, an international group of cytogeneticists experienced in chromosome painting gathered to address this issue. Results of the meeting are presented in this report, which provides a nomenclature system capable of describing chromosome aberrations that occur between painted and unpainted chromosomes, as well as aberrations involving only painted chromosomes. The nomenclature is flexible enough to describe accurately even the extensively rearranged chromosomes. As a consequence of this flexibility, the scheme upon which the nomenclature is based differs substantially from other systems of aberration classification. We call this system the Protocol for Aberration Identification and Nomenclature Terminology (PAINT).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7842739     DOI: 10.1159/000133916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  24 in total

1.  Analysis of X-ray-induced aberrations in human chromosome 5 using high-resolution multicolour banding FISH (mBAND).

Authors:  C Johannes; I Chudoba; G Obe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Induction of chromosomal instability by chronic oxidative stress.

Authors:  Charles L Limoli; Erich Giedzinski
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Preferential reduction of dicentrics in reciprocal exchanges due to the combination of the size of broken chromosome segments by radiation.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Isamu Hayata
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  FISH-based analysis of 10- and 25-kV soft X-ray-induced DNA damage in 184A1 human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  E Beyreuther; W Dörr; A Lehnert; E Lessmann; J Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Chromosomal mosaicism in mouse two-cell embryos after paternal exposure to acrylamide.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; Xiu Lowe; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Familial complex chromosome rearrangement ascertained by in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  C Fuster; L Miguez; R Miró; M A Rigola; A Perez; J Egozcue
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Paternally inherited chromosomal structural aberrations detected in mouse first-cleavage zygote metaphases by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization painting.

Authors:  F Marchetti; X Lowe; D H Moore; J Bishop; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Increased frequency of chromosome translocations in airline pilots with long-term flying experience.

Authors:  L C Yong; A J Sigurdson; E M Ward; M A Waters; E A Whelan; M R Petersen; P Bhatti; M J Ramsey; E Ron; J D Tucker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Colour junctions as predictors of radiosensitivity: X-irradiation combined with gemcitabine in a lung carcinoma cell line.

Authors:  Natasja Castro Kreder; Chris Van Bree; Nicolaas A P Franken; Jaap Haveman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.