Literature DB >> 7841969

Symbiotic relationships of quality of life, health services research and other health research.

R M Andersen1, P L Davidson, P A Ganz.   

Abstract

Clinical biomedical research, the traditional research orientation of quality of life (QOL) researchers, is chiefly concerned with disease processes and assessing the impact of therapeutic interventions on improving health status and QOL outcomes. This paper suggests, however, that the biomedical paradigm limits utility of QOL research findings in terms of its ability to shape health policy and improve health-related QOL in populations at risk. This paper proposes that health services research (HSR) and other health research paradigms can be used to assess QOL from multiple perspectives. HSR and QOL research can be mutually beneficial. The models for understanding health services utilized in HSR may assist in defining major determinants of QOL and the interaction of QOL with its environment. Conversely, QOL measures may be used to establish the relevance of HSR to people's well-being. The paper first defines the domain of HSR and the domain of quality of life. In order to understand their relationship, we consider what a model or paradigm for each might be, and how they would overlap. Finally, a merging of conceptual frameworks is proposed, linking QOL research to HSR and other health research. Ultimately, expanding the QOL paradigm beyond the biomedical model will promote two objectives. First, it will permit research findings to contribute more fully to shaping national health policy by considering the broader community and the delivery system factors which influence QOL. Second, researchers will be more aware of a broader range of factors affecting patients and will incorporate this in their research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7841969     DOI: 10.1007/bf00451728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  19 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of health status in the 1990s.

Authors:  D L Patrick; M Bergner
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 3.  Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Quality of life during antihypertensive treatment. Refining its measurement to individualize drug selection.

Authors:  S Julius
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1988-02-29       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Quality of life in cancer: definition, purpose, and method of measurement.

Authors:  D F Cella; D S Tulsky
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Quality of life issues in hypertension: consequences of diagnosis and considerations in management.

Authors:  N K Wenger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy.

Authors:  F J Fowler; J E Wennberg; R P Timothy; M J Barry; A G Mulley; D Hanley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The importance of quality of life research for health care reform in the USA and the future of public health.

Authors:  G A Gellert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  9 in total

1.  Quality of life domains in the healthy public: A trial investigation using attendants for an annual health checkup.

Authors:  K Tarumi; Y Imanaka; Y Isshiki; K Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Suicide Attempts After Emergency Room Visits: The Effect of Patient Safety Goals.

Authors:  John Robst
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2015-12

3.  Adapting the Andersen model to a francophone West African immigrant population: hepatitis B screening and linkage to care in New York City.

Authors:  Demetri A Blanas; Kim Nichols; Mulusew Bekele; Hari Shankar; Saba Bekele; Lina Jandorf; Saria Izzeldin; Daouda Ndiaye; Adama Traore; Motahar Bassam; Ponni V Perumalswami
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-02

4.  Receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant prostate cancer care among African American and Caucasian American men in North Carolina.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Bonny Blackard; William R Carpenter; Merle Mishel; Ronald C Chen; Paul A Godley; James L Mohler; Jeannette T Bensen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Factors associated with health services utilization between the years 2010 and 2012 in Korea: using Andersen's Behavioral model.

Authors:  Han-Kyoul Kim; Munjae Lee
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2015-11-27

6.  Bifactor model of the CASP-12's general factor for measuring quality of life in older patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kerry
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-12-04

7.  Effect of Community-Based Health Insurance on Healthcare-Seeking Behavior for Childhood Illnesses Among Rural Mothers in Aneded District, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Muluye Molla Simieneh; Mezgebu Yitayal; Abebaw Addis Gelagay
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-04-21

8.  Quality of life in schizophrenia: a grounded theory approach.

Authors:  Louise Gee; Emma Pearce; Mike Jackson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Predicting use of case management support services for adolescents and adults living in community following brain injury: A longitudinal Canadian database study with implications for life care planning.

Authors:  B Baptiste; D R Dawson; D Streiner
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.