Literature DB >> 7838958

The effects of indium-111 decay on pBR322 DNA.

S K Sahu1, A I Kassis, G M Makrigiorgos, J Baranowska-Kortylewicz, S J Adelstein.   

Abstract

We have compared the effectiveness in causing DNA strand breaks of 111In bound to DNA or free in aqueous solution with that of gamma rays. Supercoiled DNA from pBR322 plasmid labeled with [3H]thymidine was purified and mixed with 111InCl3 in the absence or presence of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic dianhydride (DTPA), a metal chelator which prevents the binding of indium to DNA. The reaction mixtures were stored at 4 degrees C to accumulate radiation dose from the decay of 111In. The DNA was then resolved by gel electrophoresis into supercoiled, nicked circular and linear forms, representing undamaged DNA, single-strand breaks (SSBs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs), respectively. The D0 values of pBR322 DNA exposed to gamma radiation from an external 137Cs source and the decay of 111In dispersed in solution (+DTPA) are 3.1 +/- 0.1 and 2.8 +/- 0.1 Gy, respectively. In terms of accumulated 111In disintegrations cm-3 of plasmid DNA solution, the D0 value is 15.3 (+/- 0.7) x 10(10) disintegrations in the absence of DTPA and 38.2 (+/- 1.1) x 10(10) disintegrations in its presence. Since only 14.6 +/- 5% of the 111In was bound to DNA in the absence of DTPA, an effective D0 for bound 111In of 3.4 (+/- 1.1) x 10(10) disintegrations is obtained. The 11-fold (range 9- to 17-fold) increased effectiveness of this Auger electron emitter when in proximity to DNA appears to be due mainly to the higher yield of SSBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7838958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  6 in total

1.  A computer-generated supercoiled model of the pUC19 plasmid.

Authors:  E A Kümmerle; E Pomplun
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Effect of distance between decaying (125)I and DNA on Auger-electron induced double-strand break yield.

Authors:  Pichumani Balagurumoorthy; Xiang Xu; Ketai Wang; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 3.  How Non-invasive in vivo Cell Tracking Supports the Development and Translation of Cancer Immunotherapies.

Authors:  Madeleine Iafrate; Gilbert O Fruhwirth
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Validation of the plasmid study to relate DNA damaging effects of radionuclides to those from external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Elise Verger; Jordan Cheng; Vittorio de Santis; Madeleine Iafrate; Jessica A Jackson; Cinzia Imberti; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Philip J Blower; Michelle T Ma; Daniel R Burnham; Samantha Y A Terry
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  Imaging of T-cells and their responses during anti-cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Massis Krekorian; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Mangala Srinivas; Carl G Figdor; Sandra Heskamp; Timothy H Witney; Erik H J G Aarntzen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Multi-modal imaging probe for assessing the efficiency of stem cell delivery to orthotopic breast tumours.

Authors:  May Zaw Thin; Helen Allan; Robin Bofinger; Tomas D Kostelec; Simon Guillaume; John J Connell; P Stephen Patrick; Helen C Hailes; Alethea B Tabor; Mark F Lythgoe; Daniel J Stuckey; Tammy L Kalber
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.