Elise Verger1, Jordan Cheng1, Vittorio de Santis1, Madeleine Iafrate1, Jessica A Jackson1, Cinzia Imberti1, Gilbert O Fruhwirth2, Philip J Blower1, Michelle T Ma1, Daniel R Burnham3, Samantha Y A Terry4. 1. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. 2. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom. 3. Single Molecule Imaging of Genome Duplication and Maintenance Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom. 4. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: samantha.terry@kcl.ac.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The biological consequences of absorbed radiation doses are ill-defined for radiopharmaceuticals, unlike for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). A reliable assay that assesses the biological consequences of any radionuclide is much needed. Here, we evaluated the cell-free plasmid DNA assay to determine the relative biological effects of radionuclides such as Auger electron-emitting [67Ga]GaCl3 or [111In]InCl3 compared to EBRT. METHODS: Supercoiled pBR322 plasmid DNA (1.25 or 5 ng/μL) was incubated with 0.5 or 1 MBq [67Ga]GaCl3 or [111In]InCl3 for up to 73 h or was exposed to EBRT (137Cs; 5 Gy/min; 0-40 Gy). The induction of relaxed and linear plasmid DNA, representing single and double strand breaks, respectively, was assessed by gel electrophoresis. Chelated forms of 67Ga were also investigated using DOTA and THP. Topological conversion rates for supercoiled-to-relaxed (ksrx) or relaxed-to-linear (krlx) DNA were obtained by fitting a kinetic model. RESULTS: DNA damage increased both with EBRT dose and incubation time for [67Ga]GaCl3 and [111In]InCl3. Damage caused by [67Ga]GaCl3 decreased when chelated. [67Ga]GaCl3 proved more damaging than [111In]InCl3; 1.25 ng/μL DNA incubated with 0.5 MBq [67Ga]GaCl3 for 2 h led to a 70% decrease of intact plasmid DNA as opposed to only a 19% decrease for [111In]InCl3. For both EBRT and radionuclides, conversion rates were slower for 5 ng/μL than 1.25 ng/μL plasmid DNA. DNA damage caused by 1 Gy EBRT was the equivalent to damage caused by 0.5 MBq unchelated [67Ga]GaCl3 and [111In]InCl3 after 2.05 ± 0.36 and 9.3 ± 0.77 h of incubation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This work has highlighted the power of the plasmid DNA assay for a rapid determination of the relative biological effects of radionuclides compared to external beam radiotherapy. It is envisaged this approach will enable the systematic assessment of imaging and therapeutic radionuclides, including Auger electron-emitters, to further inform radiopharmaceutical design and application.
INTRODUCTION: The biological consequences of absorbed radiation doses are ill-defined for radiopharmaceuticals, unlike for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). A reliable assay that assesses the biological consequences of any radionuclide is much needed. Here, we evaluated the cell-free plasmid DNA assay to determine the relative biological effects of radionuclides such as Auger electron-emitting [67Ga]GaCl3 or [111In]InCl3 compared to EBRT. METHODS: Supercoiled pBR322 plasmid DNA (1.25 or 5 ng/μL) was incubated with 0.5 or 1 MBq [67Ga]GaCl3 or [111In]InCl3 for up to 73 h or was exposed to EBRT (137Cs; 5 Gy/min; 0-40 Gy). The induction of relaxed and linear plasmid DNA, representing single and double strand breaks, respectively, was assessed by gel electrophoresis. Chelated forms of 67Ga were also investigated using DOTA and THP. Topological conversion rates for supercoiled-to-relaxed (ksrx) or relaxed-to-linear (krlx) DNA were obtained by fitting a kinetic model. RESULTS: DNA damage increased both with EBRT dose and incubation time for [67Ga]GaCl3 and [111In]InCl3. Damage caused by [67Ga]GaCl3 decreased when chelated. [67Ga]GaCl3 proved more damaging than [111In]InCl3; 1.25 ng/μL DNA incubated with 0.5 MBq [67Ga]GaCl3 for 2 h led to a 70% decrease of intact plasmid DNA as opposed to only a 19% decrease for [111In]InCl3. For both EBRT and radionuclides, conversion rates were slower for 5 ng/μL than 1.25 ng/μL plasmid DNA. DNA damage caused by 1 Gy EBRT was the equivalent to damage caused by 0.5 MBq unchelated [67Ga]GaCl3 and [111In]InCl3 after 2.05 ± 0.36 and 9.3 ± 0.77 h of incubation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This work has highlighted the power of the plasmid DNA assay for a rapid determination of the relative biological effects of radionuclides compared to external beam radiotherapy. It is envisaged this approach will enable the systematic assessment of imaging and therapeutic radionuclides, including Auger electron-emitters, to further inform radiopharmaceutical design and application.
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Il Minn; Ying Chen; Ana P Kiess; Robert Hobbs; George Sgouros; Ronnie C Mease; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Colette J Shen; Catherine A Foss; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C Parker; S Nilsson; D Heinrich; S I Helle; J M O'Sullivan; S D Fosså; A Chodacki; P Wiechno; J Logue; M Seke; A Widmark; D C Johannessen; P Hoskin; D Bottomley; N D James; A Solberg; I Syndikus; J Kliment; S Wedel; S Boehmer; M Dall'Oglio; L Franzén; R Coleman; N J Vogelzang; C G O'Bryan-Tear; K Staudacher; J Garcia-Vargas; M Shan; Ø S Bruland; O Sartor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edgar Pereira; Letícia do Quental; Elisa Palma; Maria Cristina Oliveira; Filipa Mendes; Paula Raposinho; Isabel Correia; João Lavrado; Salvatore Di Maria; Ana Belchior; Pedro Vaz; Isabel Santos; António Paulo Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Francis Man; Lindsay Lim; Alessia Volpe; Alberto Gabizon; Hilary Shmeeda; Benjamin Draper; Ana C Parente-Pereira; John Maher; Philip J Blower; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Rafael T M de Rosales Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Célia Fernandes; Elisa Palma; Francisco Silva; Ana Belchior; Catarina I G Pinto; Joana F Guerreiro; Hugo M Botelho; Filipa Mendes; Paula Raposinho; António Paulo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 6.208