Literature DB >> 7838588

What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement?

Mark P Jensen1, Judith A Turner, Joan M Romano.   

Abstract

An important issue that has yet to be resolved in pain measurement literature concerns the number of levels needed to assess self-reported pain intensity. An examination of treatment outcome literature shows a large variation in the number of levels used, from as few as 4 (e.g., 4-point Verbal Rating scales (VRS)) to as many as 101 (e.g., 101-point Numerical Rating scales (NRS)). The purpose of this study was to provide an empirically derived guideline for determining the number of levels needed. Chronic pain patients (n = 124) provided pre- and post-treatment measures of pain intensity using 101-point NRS for least, most, current, and average pain. The patients' responses to the measures were examined closely to determine the actual number of levels used. In addition, their responses to the 101-point scales were recorded to form 7 scales of varying levels (2- to 101-point scales). The sensitivity of the 7 recorded scales was examined. The results indicated that little information is lost if 101-point scales are coded as 11- or 21-point scales. Moreover, examination of the actual responses to the 101-point measure showed that almost all patients treated it as a 21-point scale by providing responses in multiples of 5 or 10, while a substantial number of patients treated it as an 11-point scale, providing responses in multiples of 10 only. The results suggest that 10- and 21-point scales provide sufficient levels of discrimination, in general, for chronic pain patients to describe pain intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7838588     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90133-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  150 in total

1.  Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain.

Authors:  Sylvie Richard; Clermont E Dionne; Arie Nouwen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-09

2.  Risk factors for chronic pain after open ventral hernia repair by underlay mesh placement.

Authors:  Caroline Gronnier; Jean-Michel Wattier; Hugo Favre; Guillaume Piessen; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Topiramate therapy for symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  A Siniscalchi; L Gallelli; D Scornaienghi; F Mancuso; G De Sarro
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Comparison of insulin diluent leakage postinjection using two different needle lengths and injection volumes in obese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Debra A Ignaut; Haoda Fu
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

5.  Assessing the Psychometric Properties of an Activity Pacing Questionnaire for Chronic Pain and Fatigue.

Authors:  Deborah Antcliff; Malcolm Campbell; Steve Woby; Philip Keeley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04-23

6.  Lumbar manipulation and exercise for the treatment of acute low back pain in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mitchell Selhorst; Brittany Selhorst
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-09

7.  Associates of physical function and pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Sara R Piva; G Kelley Fitzgerald; James J Irrgang; Julie M Fritz; Stephen Wisniewski; Gerald T McGinty; John D Childs; Manuel A Domenech; Scott Jones; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness does not predict patients with low back pain who improve with trunk stabilization exercises.

Authors:  Kristen A Zielinski; Sharon M Henry; Rebecca H Ouellette-Morton; Michael J DeSarno
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise.

Authors:  Nicole H Raney; Evan J Petersen; Tracy A Smith; James E Cowan; Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Sara P Gombatto; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.