Literature DB >> 22538152

Comparison of insulin diluent leakage postinjection using two different needle lengths and injection volumes in obese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Debra A Ignaut1, Haoda Fu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smaller gauge, shorter needles have been shown to be as safe and effective for insulin delivery as longer needles in many patients. However, in obese patients with diabetes, results have been inconsistent with regard to the impact of needle length on leakage of injectate.
METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, two-period, crossover study compared injections with 5 mm needles to 8 mm needles regarding leakage, pain, bleeding, and bruising at abdominal injection sites in obese patients with diabetes using 20- and 60-unit (U) volume equivalent injections of sterile insulin diluent.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (54% male; mean age 56 years; mean body mass index of 36 kg/m(2)) with type 1 (n = 13) or type 2 (n = 43) diabetes participated. Median leakage (U) was similar for both needles [0.04 (5 mm/20 U) vs 0.02 (8 mm/20 U), P = .32; and 0.04 (5 mm/60 U) vs 0.02 (8 mm/60 U), P = .48]. Pain scores (mean) were similar [1.27 (5 mm/20 U) vs 1.14 (8 mm/20 U), P = .75, and 1.68 (5 mm/60 U) vs 0.95 (8 mm/60 U, P = .21)]. The proportion of injections with bleeding [10.8% (5 mm/20 U) vs 5.83% (8 mm/20 U), P = .23, and 4.92% (5 mm/60 U) vs 6.56% (8 mm/60 U), P = .73] and the proportion of patients with bruising [8.11% (5 mm/20 U) vs 10.81% (8 mm/20 U), p = .56, and 21.05% (5 mm/60 U) vs 26.32% (8 mm/60 U), p = .65] at injection sites were similar. Mean bruise size (mm) [0.73 (5 mm/20 U] vs 2.68 (8 mm/20 U), P = .23; and 1.11 (5 mm/60 U) vs 4.21 (8 mm/60 U), P = .08] at injection sites was similar.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the suitability of the 5 mm needle for the injection of insulin in obese patients with diabetes.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538152      PMCID: PMC3380784          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  6 in total

1.  A multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover trial comparing glycemic control, satisfaction, and preference achieved with a 31 gauge x 6 mm needle versus a 29 gauge x 12.7 mm needle in obese patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sherwyn Schwartz; David Hassman; John Shelmet; Richard Sievers; Richard Weinstein; John Liang; William Lyness
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement?

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Judith A Turner; Joan M Romano
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale.

Authors:  John T Farrar; James P Young; Linda LaMoreaux; John L Werth; Michael R Poole
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  A Frid; L Hirsch; R Gaspar; D Hicks; G Kreugel; J Liersch; C Letondeur; J P Sauvanet; N Tubiana-Rufi; K Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.041

5.  Assessment of pain during medical procedures: a comparison of three scales.

Authors:  M P Jensen; L Miller; L D Fisher
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Pain assessment in younger and older pain patients: psychometric properties and patient preference of five commonly used measures of pain intensity.

Authors:  Madelon L Peters; Jacob Patijn; Inge Lamé
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.750

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Analysis and perspective: comparison of insulin diluent leakage post-injection using two different needle lengths and injection volumes in obese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection.

Authors:  Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-17

3.  Subcutaneous Injection Depth Does Not Affect the Pharmacokinetics or Glucodynamics of Insulin Lispro in Normal Weight or Healthy Obese Subjects.

Authors:  Amparo de la Peña; Kwee P Yeo; Helle Linnebjerg; Edward Catton; Shobha Reddy; Patricia Brown-Augsburger; Linda Morrow; Debra A Ignaut
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-19

4.  Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections.

Authors:  Kezia Ann Præstmark; Bente Stallknecht; Morten Lind Jensen; Thomas Sparre; Nils Berg Madsen; Jonas Kildegaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Impact of Injection Speed, Volume, and Site on Pain Sensation.

Authors:  Eric Zijlstra; Johannes Jahnke; Annelie Fischer; Christoph Kapitza; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-08

Review 6.  Recognition of and steps to mitigate anxiety and fear of pain in injectable diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Davida F Kruger; Susan LaRue; Phil Estepa
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Mathew John; A G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Sujoy Ghosh; Debmalya Sanyal; Laurence J Hirsch; Vandita Gupta; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.945

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.