Literature DB >> 7836965

The effect of space location on neglect depends on the nature of the task.

R Cubelli1, M Pugliese, A S Gabellini.   

Abstract

It has been often reported that in patients with visual neglect line bisection is more accurate in the right than in the left hemispace. However, no data are available on the effect of hemispace on reading errors associated with neglect. We examined a 62-year-old man who presented with severe left neglect following a large infarction in the right cerebral hemisphere. The patient was asked to read 180 words aloud and to bisect 90 lines. Stimuli were presented in three different spatial locations: across the centre, to the right or to the left of the body midline. Line bisection was significantly more accurate in the right hemispace compared with the centre, or the left hemispace. In contrast, reading was significantly more accurate with words presented on the left side than on the centre or right side. This is the first time that such dissociation has been reported. We hypothesize that the dissociation depends on the nature of the stimuli and on the different cognitive demands of the tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7836965     DOI: 10.1007/bf00920625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  16 in total

Review 1.  Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  R Cubelli; P Nichelli; V Bonito; A De Tanti; M G Inzaghi
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  R Tegnér; M Levander
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Unilateral visual neglect overcome by cues implicit in stimulus arrays.

Authors:  L D Kartsounis; E K Warrington
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Some determinants of visual neglect.

Authors:  J Leicester; M Sidman; L T Stoddard; J P Mohr
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  P Nichelli; M Rinaldi; R Cubelli
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect.

Authors:  M J Riddoch; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome.

Authors:  K M Heilman; D Bowers; R T Watson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  K M Heilman; E Valenstein
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity?

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Visual hemispatial inattention: stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies.

Authors:  S Weintraub; M M Mesulam
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  2 in total

1.  Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect.

Authors:  N Beschin; R Cubelli; S Della Sala; L Spinazzola
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Neglect dyslexia: a review of the neuropsychological literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vallar; Cristina Burani; Lisa S Arduino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.