Literature DB >> 7836508

Exogenous follicle stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test (EFORT): a simple and reliable screening test for detecting 'poor responders' in in-vitro fertilization.

R Fanchin1, D de Ziegler, F Olivennes, J Taieb, A Dzik, R Frydman.   

Abstract

Predicting ovarian response to stimulation constitutes a pivotal task in the organization of a successful in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether a new ovarian reserve test, the exogenous follicle stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test (EFORT), could improve the predictive value of the classical follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) measurements on cycle day 3 of ovarian stimulation regarding results of IVF. In this prospective study, 52 IVF candidates aged 27-42 years underwent 52 consecutive IVF cycles. These women received 300 IU of purified FSH i.m. on cycle day 3. Blood samples were taken just before the injection to measure plasma FSH and oestradiol; 24 h later, plasma oestradiol concentration was determined. Two menstrual cycles later, ovarian stimulation was performed for IVF using a time-release gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). For the interpretation of the EFORT results, we considered the post-FSH plasma oestradiol increment (delta E2) and the baseline plasma FSH values (bFSH). The results of these two parameters were compared with the subsequent quality of the ovarian response to stimulation for IVF and the pregnancy outcome. Our results indicated a statistically significant improvement of the predictive value of the bFSH on the ovarian stimulation outcome when the EFORT parameters (bFSH and delta E2) were analysed synergistically.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7836508     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  17 in total

1.  Mean ovarian diameter (MOD) as a predictor of poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Iavor K Vladimirov; Desislava M Tacheva; Krassimir B Kalinov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF.

Authors:  D J Hendriks; F J Broekmans; L F J M M Bancsi; C W N Looman; F H de Jong; E R te Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Predicting pregnancy in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with basal serum follicle stimulating hormone levels between 10.0 and 11.9 IU/L.

Authors:  Dan Levin; Sunny H Jun; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

Authors:  E al-Mizyen; L Sabatini; A M Lower; C M Wilson; T al-Shawaf; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Ovarian reserve test with human menopausal gonadotropin as a predictor of in vitro fertilization outcome.

Authors:  F Fábregues; J Balasch; M Creus; F Carmona; B Puerto; L Quintó; R Casamitjana; J A Vanrell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The value of human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation test in predicting ovarian response during in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Assaf Ben-Meir; David Shveiky; Einat Zivi; Tomer Feigenberg; Ariel Revel; Alex Simon; Neri Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  A prospective evaluation of antral follicle function in women with 46,XX spontaneous primary ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Ziad R Hubayter; Vaishali Popat; Vien H Vanderhoof; Obioma Ndubizu; Diane Johnson; Edie Mao; Karim A Calis; James F Troendle; Lawrence M Nelson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Estradiol level on day 9 as a predictor of risk for ovarian hyperresponse during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Ho; Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee; Ming-Huei Lin; Yuh-Ming Hwu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Evaluation of ovarian reserve in infertile patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Fırat Mutlu; Ahmet Erdem
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.