Literature DB >> 7835799

Salvage chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

M C Christian1, E L Trimble.   

Abstract

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is a highly chemosensitive solid tumor with response rates of 70-80% to first-line chemotherapy, including a high proportion of complete responses. The majority of patients, however, eventually relapse and ultimately die of chemoresistant disease. Response rates to salvage agents are modest, and duration of response is relatively short. Important new agents have been identified in the salvage setting, however, and all patients with ovarian cancer recurring or persisting after front-line therapy should be encouraged to enroll in clinical trials. Phase II trials should include multiple adequately sized cohorts, for patients with platinum-sensitive disease and those with platinum-refractory disease. In addition, patients should be stratified by treatment-free interval. An effort should be made to report standard response endpoints, such as median duration of response, median time to progression, and median survival. Retreatment with a platinum-containing compound is appropriate in patients with platinum-sensitive disease. Trials of high-dose chemotherapy with hematologic support may be most appropriate for patients with minimal disease following first-line therapy, but are unlikely to benefit patients with platinum-resistant or bulky disease. Paclitaxel should figure prominently in consideration of salvage therapy for patients with platinum-resistant disease. Responses to other single agents or combination chemotherapy have been modest and generally of short duration. Efforts at hormonal therapy have been disappointing. Promising new agents include topoisomerase I inhibitors, such as topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, irinotecan (CPT-11), and pyrazoloacridine. Therapies focusing on novel molecular targets include antiangiogenesis agents, antimetastatic agents, and signal transduction inhibitors. Immunotherapy, including radioimmunotherapy, immunotoxins, and direct antitumor effects of monoclonal antibodies, may be useful. Greater understanding of the molecular pathology of ovarian cancer may help us develop more rational and effective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7835799     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

Review 1.  Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women.

Authors:  R E van Rijswijk; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  p19(INK4d) mRNA and protein expression as new prognostic factors in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Felisiak-Golabek; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Iwona K Rzepecka; Lukasz Szafron; Ewa Kwiatkowska; Bozena Konopka; Agnieszka Podgorska; Alina Rembiszewska; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  The roles of second-look laparotomy and cancer antigen 125 in the management of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  A E Selman; L J Copeland
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Clinical efficacy and prospects for use of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of ovarian and breast cancers.

Authors:  F M Muggia
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Nuclear survivin expression is a positive prognostic factor in taxane-platinum-treated ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Felisiak-Golabek; Alina Rembiszewska; Iwona K Rzepecka; Lukasz Szafron; Radoslaw Madry; Magdalena Murawska; Tomasz Napiorkowski; Piotr Sobiczewski; Beata Osuch; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 6.  Potential of vesicular stomatitis virus as an oncolytic therapy for recurrent and drug-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joshua F Heiber; Xiang-Xi Xu; Glen N Barber
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-04

7.  The significance of c.690G>T polymorphism (rs34529039) and expression of the CEBPA gene in ovarian cancer outcome.

Authors:  Bozena Konopka; Lukasz Michal Szafron; Ewa Kwiatkowska; Agnieszka Podgorska; Aleksandra Zolocinska; Barbara Pienkowska-Grela; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Anna Balcerak; Martyna Lukasik; Anna Stachurska; Agnieszka Timorek; Beata Spiewankiewicz; Mona El-Bahrawy; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

8.  TP53 status and taxane-platinum versus platinum-based therapy in ovarian cancer patients: a non-randomized retrospective study.

Authors:  Jolanta Kupryjanczyk; Ewa Kraszewska; Izabela Ziolkowska-Seta; Radoslaw Madry; Agnieszka Timorek; Janina Markowska; Jerzy Stelmachow; Mariusz Bidzinski
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  TP53 status determines clinical significance of ERBB2 expression in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J Kupryjańczyk; R Madry; J Plisiecka-Hałasa; J Bar; E Kraszewska; I Ziółkowska; A Timorek; J Stelmachów; J Emerich; M Jedryka; A Płuzańska; I Rzepka-Górska; K Urbański; J Zieliński; J Markowska
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of clinical significance of TP53, BCL-2, BAX and MEK1 expression in 229 ovarian carcinomas treated with platinum-based regimen.

Authors:  J Kupryjańczyk; T Szymańska; R Madry; A Timorek; J Stelmachów; G Karpińska; A Rembiszewska; I Ziółkowska; E Kraszewska; J Debniak; J Emerich; M Ułańska; A Płuzańska; M Jedryka; M Goluda; A Chudecka-Głaz; I Rzepka-Górska; M Klimek; K Urbański; J Breborowicz; J Zieliński; J Markowska
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.