Literature DB >> 7834635

Detection of chromosomal breakage in the 1cen-1q12 region of interphase human lymphocytes using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization with tandem DNA probes.

D S Rupa1, L Hasegawa, D A Eastmond.   

Abstract

A novel multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization approach, using an alpha satellite probe which labels the centromeric region on chromosome 1 and a classical satellite probe which targets an adjacent breakage-prone region (1q12), has been used to detect both hyperdiploidy and chromosome breakage in interphase human cells. With the use of this technique significant increases in chromosomal breakage were observed in interphase and metaphase lymphocytes irradiated in vitro. Metaphase analysis indicated that a significant proportion of these breakage events represented potentially stable aberrations such as translocations and inversions. A comparison of frequencies using a single classical satellite probe and the adjacent alpha and classical satellite probes indicated that this tandem label procedure allowed chromosomal breakage to be detected and distinguished from hyperdiploidy in untreated interphase lymphocytes, indicating the potential of this procedure for human biomonitoring. To determine whether this hybridization approach could detect alterations in humans, peripheral blood lymphocytes were obtained from a group of pesticide applicators and mixers and compared with a nonexposed control group. Significant increases in both hyperdiploidy and chromosomal breakage affecting the labeled region on chromosome 1 were observed in the pesticide-exposed group. These results indicate that this hybridization strategy allows hyperdiploidy and chromosomal breakage to be detected rapidly in interphase human cells and may facilitate the detection of chromosomal alterations in human populations exposed to carcinogenic and genotoxic agents using tissues which have not been previously amenable for cytogenetic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7834635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  14 in total

1.  Merotelic attachments and non-homologous end joining are the basis of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Astrid Alonso Guerrero; Carlos Martínez-A; Karel Hm van Wely
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.130

Review 2.  Epigenetic regulation of heterochromatic DNA stability.

Authors:  Jamy C Peng; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Community-Based Participatory Research and Gene-Environment Interaction Methodologies Addressing Environmental Justice among Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Women and Children in Texas: "From Mother to Child Project"

Authors:  María A Hernández-Valero; Angelica P Herrera; Sheila H Zahm; Lovell A Jones
Journal:  Calif J Health Promot       Date:  2007-05

4.  Multicolor FISH analysis of chromosomal breaks, duplications, deletions, and numerical abnormalities in the sperm of healthy men.

Authors:  E D Sloter; X Lowe; D H Moore II; J Nath; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-28       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Cytogenetic Monitoring of Farmers exposed to pesticides in Colombia.

Authors:  L S Hoyos; S Carvajal; L Solano; J Rodriguez; L Orozco; Y López; W W Au
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Exclusive homodimerization of the orphan receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 defines a new subclass of nuclear receptors.

Authors:  G Jiang; L Nepomuceno; K Hopkins; F M Sladek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Centromere fission, not telomere erosion, triggers chromosomal instability in human carcinomas.

Authors:  Carlos Martínez-A; Karel H M van Wely
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards.

Authors:  J C Barrett; H Vainio; D Peakall; B D Goldstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Cytogenetic markers of susceptibility: influence of polymorphic carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes.

Authors:  H Norppa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Current cytogenetic methods for detecting exposure and effects of mutagens and carcinogens.

Authors:  A T Natarajan; J J Boei; F Darroudi; P C Van Diemen; F Dulout; M P Hande; A T Ramalho
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.