Literature DB >> 9255568

Cytogenetic markers of susceptibility: influence of polymorphic carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes.

H Norppa1.   

Abstract

Polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, responsible for individual differences in metabolic activation and detoxification reactions, may profoundly modulate the effects of chemical carcinogens. In the case of genotoxic carcinogens, differences in biological effects due to genetic polymorphisms can be evaluated by cytogenetic methods such as the analysis of chromosomal aberrations (CAs), sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), micronuclei (MN), and changes in chromosome number. These techniques can be applied to any exposure known to induce such alterations, without additional method development for each exposing agent. The influence of polymorphic genes on the cytogenetic effects of a carcinogen can quickly be tested in vitro using metabolically competent cells collected from donors representing different genotypes or phenotypes. For instance, erythrocytes from individuals positive for glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) express GSTT1, whereas GSTT1-null donors, having a homozygous deletion of the GSTT1 gene, completely lack this detoxification enzyme. This deficiency results in highly increased sensitivity to SCE induction in whole-blood lymphocyte cultures by 1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane, a reactive metabolite of 1,3-butadiene. The same cytogenetic techniques can also be applied as effect biomarkers in studies of human populations exposed to genotoxic carcinogens. For example, elevated rates of chromosome damage have been detected among smokers lacking glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1-null genotype), and the baseline level of SCEs seems to be increased in GSTT1-null individuals. Information obtained from cytogenetic studies of genetic polymorphisms can be used, for example, to recognize the genotoxically relevant substrates of the polymorphic enzymes, to identify genotypes that are susceptible to these genotoxins, to improve in vitro genotoxicity tests utilizing human cells, to increase the sensitivity of cytogenetic endpoints as biomarkers of genotoxic effects in humans, and to direct mechanistic studies and cancer epidemiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9255568      PMCID: PMC1470062          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s4829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  47 in total

1.  Micronucleated cells in nasal mucosa of formaldehyde-exposed workers.

Authors:  C Ballarin; F Sarto; L Giacomelli; G B Bartolucci; E Clonfero
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Bimodal distribution of sensitivity to SCE induction by diepoxybutane in human lymphocytes. II. Relationship to baseline SCE frequency.

Authors:  K T Kelsey; D C Christiani; J K Wiencke
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Micronuclei as an index of cytogenetic damage: past, present, and future.

Authors:  J A Heddle; M C Cimino; M Hayashi; F Romagna; M D Shelby; J D Tucker; P Vanparys; J T MacGregor
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Rapid human chromosome aberration analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  J N Lucas; T Tenjin; T Straume; D Pinkel; D Moore; M Litt; J W Gray
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Interlocus V-J recombination measures genomic instability in agriculture workers at risk for lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  S Lipkowitz; V F Garry; I R Kirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Polymorphism of glutathione conjugation of methyl bromide, ethylene oxide and dichloromethane in human blood: influence on the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in lymphocytes.

Authors:  E Hallier; T Langhof; D Dannappel; M Leutbecher; K Schröder; H W Goergens; A Müller; H M Bolt
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Individual susceptibility to induced chromosome damage and its implications for detecting genotoxic exposures in human populations.

Authors:  J K Wiencke; M R Wrensch; R Miike; N L Petrakis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Human glutathione S-transferase deficiency as a marker of susceptibility to epoxide-induced cytogenetic damage.

Authors:  J K Wiencke; K T Kelsey; R A Lamela; W A Toscano
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Increased cytogenetic damage in smokers deficient in glutathione S-transferase isozyme mu.

Authors:  G van Poppel; N de Vogel; P J van Balderen; F J Kok
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Incidence of cancer in 161 families affected by ataxia-telangiectasia.

Authors:  M Swift; D Morrell; R B Massey; C L Chase
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  Polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 genes and chromosomal aberrations in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Varvara I Minina; Olga A Soboleva; Andrey N Glushkov; Elena N Voronina; Ekaterina A Sokolova; Marina L Bakanova; Yana A Savchenko; Anastasia V Ryzhkova; Ruslan A Titov; Vladimir G Druzhinin; Maxim Yu Sinitsky; Maxim A Asanov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Effect of gene polymorphisms and ethanol consumption on micronucleus frequency in human reticulocytes: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chuancheng Wu; Yuquan Lu; Kanehisa Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Genotoxic risk assessment in professionals working hairdressers area using buccal micronucleus assay, in Aydın City, Turkey.

Authors:  Özlem Sultan Aslantürk; Tülay Aşkin Çelik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Interactive effect of the glutathione S-transferase genes and cigarette smoking on occurrence and severity of coronary artery risk.

Authors:  Serena Masetti; Nicoletta Botto; Samantha Manfredi; Maria Giovanna Colombo; Antonio Rizza; Cristina Vassalle; Aldo Clerico; Andrea Biagini; Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Similarities and differences in the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes between human hepatic cell lines and primary human hepatocytes.

Authors:  Lei Guo; Stacey Dial; Leming Shi; William Branham; Jie Liu; Jia-Long Fang; Bridgett Green; Helen Deng; Jim Kaput; Baitang Ning
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Identification of novel potential genetic predictors of urothelial bladder carcinoma susceptibility in Pakistani population.

Authors:  Syeda Hafiza Benish Ali; Kashif Sardar Bangash; Abdur Rauf; Muhammad Younis; Khursheed Anwar; Raja Khurram; Muhammad Athar Khawaja; Maleeha Azam; Abid Ali Qureshi; Saeed Akhter; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Raheel Qamar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Relationship between the Glutathione-S-Transferase P1, M1, and T1 Genotypes and Prostate Cancer Risk in Korean Subjects.

Authors:  Dong Deuk Kwon; Jea Whan Lee; Dong Youp Han; Il Young Seo; Seung Chel Park; Hee Jong Jeong; Yun Sik Yang; Soo-Cheon Chae; Kyung Sook Na; Kum Ja Mo; Joung Joong Kim; Joung Sik Rim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22

8.  Wider action plan and multidisciplinar approach could be a wining idea in creation of friendly environment.

Authors:  Natasa Gojkovic-Bukvic; Nenad Bukvic
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-02-08

Review 9.  12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards.

Authors:  J C Barrett; H Vainio; D Peakall; B D Goldstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The importance of understanding the distribution of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes and haplotypes in a region with intense agriculture activity.

Authors:  Alessandro Arruda Alves; Fernanda Craveiro Franco; Fernanda Ribeiro Godoy; Jheneffer Sonara Aguiar Ramos; Hugo Freire Nunes; Thannya Nascimento Soares; Daniela de Melo E Silva
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-12-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.