Literature DB >> 7834452

Internal mammary node status: a major prognosticator in axillary node-negative breast cancer.

H S Cody1, J A Urban.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The internal mammary lymph nodes (IMN) have received little attention in recent years, yet are a well-documented site of metastasis and a major prognostic factor in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS/
RESULTS: Ten-year follow-up of the final 195 patients treated by extended radical mastectomy (ERM) in this practice (selected largely on the basis of medial tumor location, and comprising 15% of all patients treated from 1965 to 1978) found IMN+ in 24% of all cases: 36% of AX+ versus 18% of AX- patients (p = 0.0023). In a multivariate analysis, the disease-free survival impact of IMN+ (p = 0.004) was second only to axillary node involvement (p < 0.0005), and surpassed tumor size (p = 0.077). IMN+ was equally frequent for tumors less than, or greater than, 2 cm (24%), and was not significantly related to patient age. Among AX- patients, there was a twofold greater risk of recurrence or death at 10 years for IMN+ than for IMN-. Among T1N0 patients, 19.6% were IMN+.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to consider IMN status in the steadily enlarging cohort of T1N0 breast cancers may result in the undertreatment of a significant proportion of stage I patients. Systemic adjuvant therapy should be considered for T1N0 patients with central or medial tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7834452     DOI: 10.1007/bf02303699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  25 in total

1.  Radical mastectomy in continuity with en bloc resection of the internal mammary lymph-node chain; a new procedure for primary operable cancer of the breast.

Authors:  J A URBAN; H W BAKER
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1952-09       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Have changing treatment patterns affected outcome for operable breast cancer? Ten-year follow-up in 1288 patients, 1965 to 1978.

Authors:  H S Cody; E H Laughlin; C Trillo; J A Urban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P R Rosen; S Groshen; P E Saigo; D W Kinne; S Hellman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Ten year results of an international cooperative trial in breast cancer.

Authors:  J Lacour; M Le; E Caceres; T Koszarowski; U Veronesi; C Hill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prognosis of breast cancer patients after mastectomy and dissection of internal mammary nodes.

Authors:  U Veronesi; N Cascinelli; M Greco; R Bufalino; A Morabito; D Galluzzo; R Conti; R De Lellis; V Delle Donne; P Piotti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Five-year results of an international cooperative study.

Authors:  J Lacour; P Bucalossi; E Cacers; G Jacobelli; T Koszarowski; M Le; C Rumeau-Rouquette; U Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Is it useful to remove internal mammary nodes in operable breast cancer?

Authors:  J Lacour; M G Lê; C Hill; A Kramar; G Contesso; D Sarrazin
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Extended radical operations on breast cancer of medial or central location.

Authors:  I K Seleznev
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Overview of randomized trials of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J Cuzick; H Stewart; R Peto; M Baum; B Fisher; H Host; J P Lythgoe; G Ribeiro; H Scheurlen; A Wallgren
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1987-01

10.  Invasion of the internal mammary lymph glands in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  R S HANDLEY; A C THACKRAY
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

1.  Practice patterns of lymph-node mapping and sentinel-node biopsy for breast cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Boon Chua; Ivo A Olivotto; James C Donald; Allen H Hayashi; Noelle Davis; Conrad H Rusnak
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage I to III breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda L Kong; Welela Tereffe; Kelly K Hunt; Min Yi; Taewoo Kang; Kimberly Weatherspoon; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Isabelle Bedrosian; Rosa F Hwang; Gildy V Babiera; Thomas A Buchholz; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Can the sentinel lymph node technique affect decisions to offer internal mammary chain irradiation?

Authors:  Jean-Cyril Bourre; Raoul Payan; Delphine Collomb; Céline Gallazzini-Crepin; Alex Calizzano; Marie-Dominique Desruet; Dominique Pasquier; Michel Bolla; Daniel Fagret; Jean-Philippe Vuillez
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Detection of Internal Mammary Adenopathy in Patients With Breast Cancer by PET/CT and MRI.

Authors:  Maxine S Jochelson; Lizza Lebron; Stefanie S Jacobs; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Simon N Powell; Virgilio Sacchini; Gary A Ulaner; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Halsted revisited: internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  F W van der Ent; R A Kengen; H A van der Pol; J A Povel; H J Stroeken; A G Hoofwijk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer.

Authors:  T Schulze; A Bembenek; P M Schlag
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Intra-mammary tumor location does not influence prognosis but influences the prevalence of axillary lymph-node metastases.

Authors:  Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack; Harald Sommer; Maren Schmidt; Barbara Strobl; Dorothea Rjosk; Elisabeth Klanner; Wiebke Thieleke; Bernd Gerber; Klaus Friese; Thomas Dimpfl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Lymphatic drainage patterns from the breast.

Authors:  Susanne H Estourgie; Omgo E Nieweg; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Bin B R Kroon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.