Literature DB >> 7833340

Experimental and clinical experience with distraction osteogenesis.

J Aronson1.   

Abstract

G.A. Ilizarov's clinical insights and experimental biology have developed into what is known today as distraction osteogenesis. Initially used for the treatment of fractures and nonunions, his methods have proven successful for limb lengthening and bone transportation. A brief history of the development of distraction osteogenesis, definition of terms, methods, and monitoring techniques are described. The primary mechanism, intramembranous ossification, is direct bone formation in uniform gradients of mineralization from a central fibrous interzone. New bone is produced from the local host surfaces and quickly remodels to the equivalent macro and microstructure. Blood supply at the focus of distraction, dependency on a latency period, different rates, and rhythms of distraction are all tested and discussed. Data from experimental tibial lengthening in more than 125 animals (dogs, rabbits, and rats) show that distraction osteogenesis provides unlimited new bone formation that remodels at daily rates ranging from 200 to 400 microns. In over 100 clinical cases, patients ranging in age from 18 months to 49 years have regenerated bone at an average rate of 213 microns in adults and 385 microns in children. Approximately 10% of these cases required supplemental bone grafts. The article proposes that distraction osteogenesis might be successfully applied in craniofacial surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7833340     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1994_031_0473_eacewd_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  28 in total

1.  Mouse models of bone healing: fracture, marrow ablation, and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Kyle Lybrand; Beth Bragdon; Louis Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 2.  Overview of biological mechanisms and applications of three murine models of bone repair: closed fracture with intramedullary fixation, distraction osteogenesis, and marrow ablation by reaming.

Authors:  Beth Bragdon; Kyle Lybrand; Louis Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 3.  The Effect of Photobiomodulation on Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sarvin Sarmadi; Behrad Tanbakuchi; Arian Hesam Arefi; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 4.  Bone lengthening (distraction osteogenesis): a literature review.

Authors:  F Sailhan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Physiology of bone turnover and its application in contemporary maxillofacial surgery. A review.

Authors:  Ch Iliopoulos; L Zouloumis; M Lazaridou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Preliminary results of an animal study with a dentally fixed distraction device.

Authors:  B Braumann; B Niederhagen; C Schmolke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 7.  Ilizarov principles of deformity correction.

Authors:  B Spiegelberg; T Parratt; S K Dheerendra; W S Khan; R Jennings; D R Marsh
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  Deferoxamine expedites consolidation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Sagar S Deshpande; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Kelsey L Johnson; Jordan T Blough; Joseph E Perosky; Kenneth M Kozloff; Peter A Felice; Noah S Nelson; Aaron S Farberg; Benjamin Levi; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Z S Ai-Aql; A S Alagl; D T Graves; L C Gerstenfeld; T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.