Literature DB >> 23598047

Deferoxamine expedites consolidation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Alexis Donneys1, Sagar S Deshpande, Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo, Kelsey L Johnson, Jordan T Blough, Joseph E Perosky, Kenneth M Kozloff, Peter A Felice, Noah S Nelson, Aaron S Farberg, Benjamin Levi, Steven R Buchman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A limitation of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) is the length of time required for consolidation. This drawback subjects patients to possible pin-site infections, as well as a prolonged return to activities of normal daily living. Developing innovative techniques to abridge consolidation periods could be immensely effective in preventing these problematic morbidities. Deferoxamine (DFO) is an angiogenic activator that triggers the HIF-1α pathway through localized iron depletion. We previously established the effectiveness of DFO in enhancing regenerate vascularity at a full consolidation period (28 days) in a murine mandibular DO model. To investigate whether this augmentation in vascularity would function to accelerate consolidation, we progressively shortened consolidation periods prior to μCT imaging and biomechanical testing (BMT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three time points (14d, 21d and 28d) were selected and six groups of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 60) were equally divided into control (C) and experimental (E) groups for each time period. Each group underwent external fixator placement, mandibular osteotomy, and a 5.1 mm distraction. During distraction, the experimental groups were treated with DFO injections into the regenerate gap. After consolidation, mandibles were imaged and tension tested to failure. ANOVA was conducted between groups, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: At 14 days of consolidation the experimental group demonstrated significant increases in bone volume fraction (BVF), bone mineral density (BMD) and ultimate load (UL) in comparison to non-treated controls. The benefit of treatment was further substantiated by a striking 100% increase in the number of bony unions at this early time-period (C:4/10 vs. E:8/10). Furthermore, metrics of BVF, BMD, Yield and UL at 14 days with treatment demonstrated comparable metrics to those of the fully consolidated 28d control group.
CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, we contend that augmentation of vascular density through localized DFO injection delivers an efficient means for accelerating bone regeneration without significantly impacting bone quality or strength.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23598047      PMCID: PMC4162399          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  31 in total

1.  Growth factor and cytokine gene expression in mechanically strained human osteoblast-like cells: implications for distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  J E Cillo; R Gassner; R R Koepsel; M J Buckley
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-08

2.  The replacement of long tubular bone defects by lengthening distraction osteotomy of one of the fragments. 1969.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov; V I Ledyaev
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mechanical testing of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 regenerated bone in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  A Kontaxis; M Abu-Serriah; A F Ayoub; J C Barbenel
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.

Authors:  J W Polley; A A Figueroa
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Vascular tissues are a primary source of BMP2 expression during bone formation induced by distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Hidenori Matsubara; Daniel E Hogan; Elise F Morgan; Douglas P Mortlock; Thomas A Einhorn; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis demonstrates significantly increased vascularity in comparison to fracture repair in the mandible.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Aaron S Farberg; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Extracorporeal shock wave accelerates consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of the rat mandible.

Authors:  Jui-Pin Lai; Feng-Sheng Wang; Chun-Min Hung; Ching-Jen Wang; Chun-Jen Huang; Yur-Ren Kuo
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-11

9.  Complications associated with gradual cranial vault distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yonehara; Shinichi Hirabayashi; Yasushi Sugawara; Atsushi Sakurai; Kiyonori Harii
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Focal adhesion kinase expression during mandibular distraction osteogenesis: evidence for mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Lawrence Tong; Steven R Buchman; Michael A Ignelzi; Samuel Rhee; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  18 in total

1.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Clinical Use of Deferoxamine in Distraction Osteogenesis of Irradiated Bone.

Authors:  Arash Momeni; Scott Rapp; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  The effect of deferoxamine on angiogenesis and bone repair in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of rabbit femoral heads.

Authors:  Jia Li; Lihong Fan; Zefeng Yu; Xiaoqian Dang; Kunzheng Wang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-10-06

4.  Radioprotection With Amifostine Enhances Bone Strength and Regeneration and Bony Union in a Rat Model of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Alexis Donneys; Sagar S Deshpande; Deniz Sarhaddi; Noah S Nelson; Laura A Monson; Sara E Dahle; Steve A Goldstein; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Significant Differences in the Bone of an Isogenic Inbred Versus Nonisogenic Outbred Murine Mandible: A Study in Rigor and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Edward G Carey; Sagar S Deshpande; Kevin M Urlaub; Alexander R Zheutlin; Noah S Nelson; Alexis Donneys; Stephen Y Kang; Kathleen K Gallagher; Peter A Felice; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 6.  Hypoxia Signaling in the Skeleton: Implications for Bone Health.

Authors:  Clare E Yellowley; Damian C Genetos
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  [Early constant observation of the effect of deferoxamine mesylate on improvement of vascularized bone regeneration in SD rat skull critical size defect model].

Authors:  W Y DU; J W Yang; T Jiang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-12-18

Review 8.  Application of chemical factors for acceleration of consolidation phase of the distraction osteogenesis: a scoping review.

Authors:  Sadra Mohaghegh; Fatemeh Alirezaei; Nima Ahmadi; Farnaz Kouhestani; Saeed Reza Motamedian
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 9.  Radiation-Induced Tissue Damage: Clinical Consequences and Current Treatment Options.

Authors:  Hillary Nepon; Tyler Safran; Edward M Reece; Amanda M Murphy; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Peter G Davison
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 2.195

10.  Targeting angiogenesis as a therapeutic means to reinforce osteocyte survival and prevent nonunions in the aftermath of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Noah S Nelson; Erin E Page; Sagar S Deshpande; Peter A Felice; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Joshua P Spiegel; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.