Literature DB >> 7829978

Radiation dose and risk in screening mammography.

D F Adcock1, D B Howe.   

Abstract

Screening mammography has not yet become a standard procedure. There are great variations in image quality and radiation dose. Mean glandular dose has become the most frequently used description of radiation dose in screening mammography. Because of the low energy x-ray beam required for the procedure, the use of mean glandular dose as the radiation exposure indicator may cause a misunderstanding of the dose-risk relationship and result in confusion about radiation exposure and the risk of induced neoplasm. Data are presented to show that increases in both maximum glandular dose and imparted energy are greater than the increases in mean glandular dose with comparable increases in breast thickness. In the future, an indication of total imparted energy should replace the use of mean glandular dose as the standard for describing radiation dose in screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7829978     DOI: 10.1007/bf00996701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  14 in total

1.  Mammography in the eighties.

Authors:  B J Conway; J L McCrohan; F G Rueter; O H Suleiman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breast cancer after multiple chest fluoroscopies: second follow-up of Massachusetts women with tuberculosis.

Authors:  Z Hrubec; J D Boice; R R Monson; M Rosenstein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The technical quality of mammography in centers participating in a regional breast cancer awareness program.

Authors:  B M Galkin; S A Feig; H D Muir
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Breast radiation dose in film/screen mammography.

Authors:  K L Prado; J T Rakowski; F Barragan; K N Vanek
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Estimation of breast doses and breast cancer risk associated with repeated fluoroscopic chest examinations of women with tuberculosis.

Authors:  J D Boice; M Rosenstein; E D Trout
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Organ dose per unit exposure resulting from fluoroscopy for artificial pneumothorax.

Authors:  G J Sherman; G R Howe; A B Miller; M Rosenstein
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  The effect of changes in dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates in the atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  D L Preston; D A Pierce
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Cancer mortality in women after repeated fluoroscopic examinations of the chest.

Authors:  J D Boice; R R Monson; M Rosenstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

Authors:  D M Eddy; V Hasselblad; W McGivney; W Hendee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; G J Sherman; J P Lindsay; M J Yaffe; P J Dinner; H A Risch; D L Preston
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.