Literature DB >> 7829401

A randomized cross-over study of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone in patients receiving chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin.

H Ohmatsu1, K Eguchi, T Shinkai, T Tamura, Y Ohe, M Nisio, H Kunikane, H Arioka, A Karato, H Nakashima.   

Abstract

We carried out a randomized, single-blind, cross-over trial to compare the antiemetic effect, for both acute and delayed emesis, of granisetron plus dexamethasone (GRN+Dx) with that of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone (HDMP+Dx). Fifty-four patients with primary or metastatic lung cancer, given single-dose cisplatin (> 80 mg/m2) chemotherapy more than twice, were enrolled in this study. They were treated with both HDMP+Dx and GRN+Dx in two consecutive chemotherapy courses. On day 1, patients experienced a mean of 2.5 (SD = 4.3) and 0.1 (SD = 0.4) episodes of vomiting in the HDMP+Dx and the GRN+Dx groups, respectively (P = 0.0008). Complete response rate on day 1 was 45 and 90% in the HDMP+Dx and the GRN+Dx groups, respectively (P = 0.0001). Patients treated with GRN+Dx had a tendency to suffer more episodes of vomiting than the HDMP+Dx group on days 2-5, but it was not statistically significant. Twenty-four patients (57%) preferred the GRN+Dx treatment and 14 patients (33%), HDMP+Dx. In the HDMP+Dx group, nine patients (21%) had an extrapyramidal reaction, and 5 patients (12%) had constipation that lasted for at least two days. In contrast, no patients had extrapyramidal reactions, and 18 patients (43%) had constipation in the GRN+Dx group (P < 0.01). GRN+Dx was more effective than HDMP+Dx only in preventing the acute emesis induced by cisplatin. An effective treatment for delayed emesis is still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7829401      PMCID: PMC5919378          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1994.tb02921.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of two dose levels of granisetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic cytostatic chemotherapy. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  I E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Identification and distribution of 5-HT3 receptors in rat brain using radioligand binding.

Authors:  G J Kilpatrick; B J Jones; M B Tyers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A comparative study of the use of granisetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist, versus a standard anti-emetic regimen of chlorpromazine plus dexamethasone in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  M Marty
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Efficacy and safety of granisetron compared with high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin in a single-blind study. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  B Chevallier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  A comparison of two dose levels of granisetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  M Soukop
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Ondansetron for the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin. A multi-center dose-response study.

Authors:  A Khojasteh; G Sartiano; E Tapazoglou; E Lester; D Gandara; S Bernard; A Finn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Italian Group For Antiemetic Research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intravenous granisetron--establishing the optimal dose. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  D Kamanabrou
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study comparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; F Cognetti; E Cortesi; G Favalli; M Marangolo; D Amadori; M A Bella; V Gramazio; D Donati
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.

Authors:  C Seynaeve; J Schuller; K Buser; H Porteder; S Van Belle; P Sevelda; D Christmann; M Schmidt; H Kitchener; D Paes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  A phase III open-label study to assess safety and efficacy of palonosetron for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in repeated cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kenjiro Aogi; Hiroshi Sakai; Hirohisa Yoshizawa; Norikazu Masuda; Nobuyuki Katakami; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Kenichi Inoue; Masaru Kuranami; Mitsuhiro Mizutani; Noriyuki Masuda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Comparative trial of two intravenous doses of granisetron (1 versus 3 mg) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced acute emesis: a double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Daiki Tsuji; Yong-Il Kim; Keisei Taku; Shigeru Nakagaki; Yoshito Ikematsu; Hiromi Tsubota; Masato Maeda; Naoya Hashimoto; Masayuki Kimura; Takashi Daimon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01

4.  Comparison between 5-day aprepitant and single-dose fosaprepitant meglumine for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yosuke Ando; Takahiro Hayashi; Kaori Ito; Eri Suzuki; Naoyuki Mine; Ayumi Miyamoto; Miyuki Oya; Hidezo Matsuda; Ami Isaji; Toru Nakanishi; Kazuyoshi Imaizumi; Tomoyuki Shibata; Tatsuyoshi Okada; Kazuo Sakurai; Kensei Naito; Ichiro Uyama; Kenji Kawada; Hiroshi Takahashi; Shigeki Yamada
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.