Literature DB >> 2169780

A comparison of two dose levels of granisetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic cytostatic chemotherapy. The Granisetron Study Group.

I E Smith1.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a novel anti-emetic, granisetron, was assessed at two dose levels (40 micrograms/kg; n = 223 and 160 micrograms/kg; n = 220) in a double-blind study in 443 patients undergoing treatment with a range of standard cytostatic therapies of which cyclophosphamide was the primary emetogenic agent for most patients. In the first 24 h, 76% of patients in the lower-dose group and 81% in the higher, experienced no vomiting and no, or only mild nausea (a complete response). Two additional doses of granisetron (40 microns/kg) were allowed on the first day to treat any symptoms of nausea and vomiting. This produced improvement or resolution of symptoms in 82% to 95% of patients. Over the 7 days of the study a complete response was maintained by 40% and 42% of patients, respectively. No differences in efficacy or safety between the two doses of granisetron were established. The commonest adverse event was headache, occurring in about 15% of patients. No extrapyramidal effects were observed. There was no relationship between the total dose and the number and severity of specific adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2169780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  5-HT3 receptor antagonists. An overview of their present status and future potential in cancer therapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  M S Aapro
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Granisetron. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use as an antiemetic.

Authors:  G L Plosker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Efficacy and safety of different doses of granisetron for the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis.

Authors:  E A Perez; R M Navari; H G Kaplan; R J Gralla; S M Grunberg; R H Palmer; D Fitts
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Methodological issues in antiemetic studies.

Authors:  M Aapro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Control of emesis by intravenous granisetron in breast cancer patients treated with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  E H Tan; P T Ang; K S Khoo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron compared with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy over 5 days. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01

Review 10.  Reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Current perspectives and future possibilities.

Authors:  A Del Favero; F Roila; M Tonato
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.