Literature DB >> 7826611

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in individual and pooled endocervical and urethral scrapes by a commercially available polymerase chain reaction.

G Lisby1, J Scheibel, L O Abrahamsson, E S Christensen, S Paloheimo.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare a commercially available PCR kit (Amplicor, Roche) with our present routine analysis (SYVA EIA) for the detection of genital C. trachomatis infection in females. Furthermore, we wished to investigate the possibility of pooling samples for PCR analysis. Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive female patients attending two gynecology clinics in Copenhagen, Denmark were included in this study. Compared to the number of samples regarded as true positives, PCR had a sensitivity of 100% (18/18) and EIA a sensitivity of 83.3% (15/18). The specificity of the PCR analysis was 99.2% (248/250) compared to 100% (250/250) for the EIA. By pooling patient samples (five patient samples in each pooled sample), a 39% reduction in reagent costs was obtained without affecting the sensitivity. In conclusion, the implementation of a standardized commercially available C. trachomatis PCR kit leads to a marked increase in analytical sensitivity compared to EIA without affecting the specificity. When pooled samples were analyzed, the cost per patient sample was reduced, but further large-scale studies are needed to rule out the possibility of a reduced sensitivity due to the dilution of individual patient samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7826611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

1.  Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects.

Authors:  S A Morré; R van Dijk; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule; S K Kjaer; C Munk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Pooling of clinical specimens prior to testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR is accurate and cost saving.

Authors:  Marian J Currie; Michelle McNiven; Tracey Yee; Ursula Schiemer; Francis J Bowden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Utility of pooled urine specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men attending public sexually transmitted infection clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR.

Authors:  Christina Lindan; Meenakshi Mathur; Sameer Kumta; Hermangi Jerajani; Alka Gogate; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Pooling urine samples for ligase chain reaction screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  K A Kacena; S B Quinn; M R Howell; G E Madico; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Pooling nasopharyngeal/throat swab specimens to increase testing capacity for influenza viruses by PCR.

Authors:  Tam T Van; Joseph Miller; David M Warshauer; Erik Reisdorf; Daniel Jernigan; Rosemary Humes; Peter A Shult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.