Literature DB >> 7824738

Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.

Y Yamashita1, M Torashima, Y Hatanaka, M Harada, Y Higashida, M Takahashi, H Mizutani, H Tashiro, J Iwamasa, K Miyazaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and of precontrast and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five blinded readers analyzed images of 80 masses in 72 patients. MR and TVUS images were interpreted in separate sessions. Findings were confirmed at surgery or laparoscopy.
RESULTS: Higher diagnostic accuracy was attained with MR imaging in mature cystic teratomas and endometriomas. However, better accuracy was achieved with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and TVUS in simple cysts, cystadenomas, and malignant tumors because internal details could be visualized. Receiver operating characteristic study indicated that observer confidence was significantly higher with contrast-enhanced MR imaging than with precontrast MR imaging (P = .011) or TVUS (P = .002) in the differentiation of benign and malignant masses.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is superior to precontrast MR and TVUS imaging in the characterization and differentiation of adnexal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7824738     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology.

Authors:  Marc Bazot; Jinane Nassar-Slaba; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Annie Cortez; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.

Authors:  A C Tsili; C Tsampoulas; M Argyropoulou; I Navrozoglou; Y Alamanos; E Paraskevaidis; S C Efremidis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Benjapa Khiewvan; Drew A Torigian; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Koosha Paydary; Ali Salavati; Sina Houshmand; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  J E Dodge; A L Covens; C Lacchetti; L M Elit; T Le; M Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis?

Authors:  B Bakir; S Bakan; M Tunaci; V L Bakir; A C Iyibozkurt; S Berkman; E Bengisu; A Salmaslioglu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  MR imaging in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S A A Sohaib; R H Reznek
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Positron emission tomography in ovarian cancer: 18F-deoxy-glucose and 16alpha-18F-fluoro-17beta-estradiol PET.

Authors:  Yoshio Yoshida; Tetsuji Kurokawa; Tetuya Tsujikawa; Hidehiko Okazawa; Fumikazu Kotsuji
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 8.  Added Value of Assessing Adnexal Masses with Advanced MRI Techniques.

Authors:  I Thomassin-Naggara; D Balvay; A Rockall; M F Carette; M Ballester; E Darai; M Bazot
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Folic acid-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  He Zhang; Jingchao Li; Yong Hu; Mingwu Shen; Xiangyang Shi; Guofu Zhang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.234

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.