Literature DB >> 21081581

Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis?

B Bakir1, S Bakan, M Tunaci, V L Bakir, A C Iyibozkurt, S Berkman, E Bengisu, A Salmaslioglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values provide specific information that allows the diagnosis of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial lesions, especially whether they can discriminate benign and malignant lesions.
METHODS: DWI was performed in 37 patients with histologically proven solid or predominantly solid adnexial lesions (22 malignant and 15 benign neoplasms). The lesions in our data set were divided into two groups, all adnexial lesions or lesions of ovarian origin, for evaluation. The areas of the highest signal intensity on DWI (b = 800 s mm(-2)) and the lowest ADC values within the lesions were evaluated.
RESULTS: On DWI, high signal intensity was observed more often in malignant than in benign lesions (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the ADC values of the malignant and benign lesions in either the adnexial (0.88±0.16 vs 0.84±0.42; p = 0.96) or the ovarian (0.85±0.14 vs 1.05±0.2; p = 0.133) lesions. When signal intensities on DWI were compared, however, malignant lesions had higher values than the benign lesions in both the adnexial (0.69±0.21 vs 0.29±0.13; p<0.0001) and the ovarian lesions (0.75±0.14 vs 0.37±0.24; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: On DWI, high signal intensity was observed more frequently with the malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21081581      PMCID: PMC3473502          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/90706205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients?

Authors:  Motoyuki Katayama; Takayuki Masui; Shigeru Kobayashi; Tatsuhiko Ito; Harumi Sakahara; Atsushi Nozaki; Hiroyuki Kabasawa
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging.

Authors:  K Togashi; K Nishimura; I Kimura; Y Tsuda; K Yamashita; T Shibata; Y Nakano; J Konishi; I Konishi; T Mori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Y Yamashita; M Torashima; Y Hatanaka; M Harada; Y Higashida; M Takahashi; H Mizutani; H Tashiro; J Iwamasa; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  MR findings of ovarian tumours with cystic components.

Authors:  T Kinoshita; K Ishii; H Naganuma; H Higashiiwai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas.

Authors:  Ken Tamai; Takashi Koyama; Tsuneo Saga; Nobuko Morisawa; Koji Fujimoto; Yoshiki Mikami; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ken Tamai; Takashi Koyama; Tsuneo Saga; Shigeaki Umeoka; Yoshiki Mikami; Shingo Fujii; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body MR screening.

Authors:  Joan C Vilanova; Joaquim Barceló
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases.

Authors:  Tomohiro Namimoto; Kazuo Awai; Takeshi Nakaura; Yumi Yanaga; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.

Authors:  Shinya Fujii; Suguru Kakite; Keisuke Nishihara; Yoshiko Kanasaki; Tasuku Harada; Junzo Kigawa; Toshio Kaminou; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Characterization of hemorrhagic adnexal lesions with MR imaging: blinded reader study.

Authors:  E Outwater; M L Schiebler; R S Owen; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics.

Authors:  Christopher Z Lam; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

2.  Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging analysis of complex adnexal masses: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Daniel Balvay; Emilie Aubert; Emile Daraï; Roman Rouzier; Charles A Cuenod; Marc Bazot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diffusion MRI on lymph node staging of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahceci; Adem Akcakaya; Naim Memmi; Ihsan Turkmen; Gokhan Cipe; Pelin Yildiz; Dilek Sema Arici; Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-06

4.  Effectiveness of semi-quantitative multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of malignancy in complex adnexal masses: radiological and pathological correlation.

Authors:  Livia Bernardin; Philip Dilks; Sidath Liyanage; Marc E Miquel; Anju Sahdev; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of primary adnexal masses by 3T MRI: categorization with conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  He Zhang; Guo-Fu Zhang; Zhi-Yan He; Zheng-Yu Li; Ming Zhu; Gui-Xiang Zhang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  The Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Kim; So-Yeon Lee; Yu Ri Shin; Chang Suk Park; Kijun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  MR findings of primary ovarian granulosa cell tumor with focus on the differentiation with other ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors.

Authors:  He Zhang; Hongyu Zhang; Shouxin Gu; Yanyu Zhang; Xuefen Liu; Guofu Zhang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  Value of 3.0 T diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating thecoma and fibrothecoma from other adnexal solid masses.

Authors:  He Zhang; Guo-Fu Zhang; Tian-Ping Wang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Pietro Valerio Foti; Giancarlo Attinà; Saveria Spadola; Rosario Caltabiano; Renato Farina; Stefano Palmucci; Giuseppe Zarbo; Rosario Zarbo; Maria D'Arrigo; Pietro Milone; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-12-16

10.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and assessment of ovarian carcinomas with vaginal deposit accidentally detected during pregnancy.

Authors:  Soha Hamed; Rasha Kamal; Mamdouh Sheeba; Marwan Mohamed El-Toukhy; Sahar Mansour
Journal:  BJR Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.