Literature DB >> 7824727

Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography.

R L Vanninen1, H I Manninen, P L Partanen, P A Vainio, S Soimakallio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) flow quantification in the evaluation of suspected carotid artery stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients referred for angiography and 10 healthy volunteers underwent Doppler ultrasound, three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR phase-contrast flow quantification to measure peak systolic velocity (PSV) and volumetric flow rate (VFR) in the common and internal carotid arteries distal to the stenosis.
RESULTS: PSV and VFR were significantly lower in the severely (> or = 70%) stenosed internal carotid arteries (P < .05). The VFR ratio (internal carotid artery-common carotid artery) achieved 91% overall accuracy for detection of severe stenosis. Combination of flow data with results of MR angiography yielded sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 78%-100%) with a modest loss in specificity. Doppler and MR measurements of PSV in the common carotid artery showed significant correlation: volunteers, r = .73; patients, r = .64.
CONCLUSION: MR flow quantification provides information about the hemodynamic significance of carotid stenosis. As an adjunct to MR angiography, it may be useful in enabling differentiation of occlusions from critical stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7824727     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Improved acceleration of phase-contrast flow imaging with magnitude difference regularization.

Authors:  Taehoon Shin; Wanyong Shin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Redistribution of cerebropetal blood flow in patients with carotid artery stenosis measured non-invasively with fast cine phase contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Mirco Cosottini; Alessandro Pingitore; Maria Chiara Michelassi; Michele Puglioli; Guido Lazzarotti; Michele Caniglia; Giuliano Parenti; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Clinical features associated with internal carotid artery occlusion do not correlate with MRA cerebropetal flow measurements.

Authors:  K J van Everdingen; L J Kappelle; C J Klijn; W P Mali; J van Der Grond
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Phase-contrast MRI with hybrid one and two-sided flow-encoding and velocity spectrum separation.

Authors:  Da Wang; Jiaxin Shao; Daniel B Ennis; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Phase contrast MRI with flow compensation view sharing.

Authors:  Da Wang; Jiaxin Shao; Stanislas Rapacchi; Matthew J Middione; Daniel B Ennis; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Carotid Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance before Treatment: 4D-Flow versus Standard 2D Imaging.

Authors:  Francesco Secchi; Caterina Beatrice Monti; Davide Capra; Renato Vitale; Daniela Mazzaccaro; Michele Conti; Ning Jin; Daniel Giese; Giovanni Nano; Francesco Sardanelli; Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.