Literature DB >> 7823579

Surrogate endpoint biomarkers for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials.

G J Kelloff1, C W Boone, J A Crowell, V E Steele, R Lubet, L A Doody.   

Abstract

Three critical aspects govern successful Phase II cancer chemoprevention trials--well-characterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable intermediate biomarkers for measuring efficacy. Requirements for the agent are experimental or epidemiological data showing chemopreventive efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for the chemopreventive activity observed. The cohort should be suitable for measuring the chemopreventive activity of the agent and the intermediate biomarkers chosen. Also, many cohorts proposed for Phase II trials are patients with previous cancers or premalignant lesions. For such patients, the trials should be conducted within the context of standard treatment to avoid unusual risks. The criteria for biomarkers are that they fit expected biological mechanisms (i.e., differential expression in normal and high-risk tissue, on or closely linked to the causal pathway for the cancer, modulated by chemopreventive agents, and short latency compared with cancer), may be assayed reliably and quantitatively, measured easily, and correlate to decreased cancer incidence. They must occur in sufficient incidence to allow their biological and statistical evaluation relevant to cancer. Since carcinogenesis is a multipath process, single biomarkers are difficult to validate as surrogate endpoints, as they may appear on only one or a few of the many possible causal pathways. Panels of biomarkers, particularly those representing the range of carcinogenesis pathways, may prove more useful as surrogate endpoints. It is important to avoid relying solely on biomarkers representing isolated events that may or may not be on the causal pathway or otherwise associated with carcinogenesis. These include markers of normal cellular processes that may be increased or expressed during carcinogenesis, but are nonspecific.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7823579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl        ISSN: 0733-1959


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Chemoprevention of prostate cancer].

Authors:  B Djavan; I Thompson; M S Michel; M Waldert; C Seitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  A cautionary note on using N-acetylcysteine as an antagonist to assess isothiocyanate-induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis.

Authors:  Lixin Mi; Paul Sirajuddin; Nanqin Gan; Xiantao Wang
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 3.  Cancer chemoprevention: Much has been done, but there is still much to do. State of the art and possible new approaches.

Authors:  Davide Serrano; Matteo Lazzeroni; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 4.  Perspectives in cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  G D Stoner; M A Morse; G J Kelloff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Effect of raloxifene on IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  R Torrisi; L Baglietto; H Johansson; G Veronesi; B Bonanni; A Guerrieri-Gonzaga; B Ballardini; A Decensi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.