Literature DB >> 7823226

After-hours telephone calls to general and subspecialty internists: an observational study.

R M Peters1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the after-hours telephone calls received by practicing general and subspecialty internists.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: Forty-four internal medicine private practices in Long Island, New York, consisting of 70 physicians (31 general internists, 39 internists with subspecialty training). PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All calls received by an answering service after office hours with the caller requesting to speak to one of the physicians in the study. Of the 8,444 total calls, 2,950 were to generalists and 5,494 were to subspecialists.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For both groups, most calls came from patients (46.3%), followed by physicians (26.0%), then hospitals (22.2%). For patient calls to the generalists, those concerning infectious disease (15.4%), nonspecific symptoms (11.1%), medication-related questions (9.7%), and gastrointestinal (GI) complaints (9.4%) were the most common. For those calls to the specialists, GI (14.2%), infectious disease (10.9%), medication-related (10.0%), and nonspecific symptom (9.0%) complaints represented the most common patient calls. Although GI and cardiology specialists received proportionally more patient calls related to their specialities, the specialty group, like the generalist group, received calls in all the major areas of internal medicine. Patient calls for problems well outside the traditional scope of internal medicine accounted for 2.9% of the calls to the generalists and 1.9% of the calls to the specialists. About 44% of the patient calls to both groups were for potentially serious problems. After 11:00 PM both groups saw a decrease in the proportions of minor and trivial calls.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations support the concept of broadly based medical training for both internal medicine generalists and subspecialist in preparation for the variety of telephone calls they will deal with after office hours. Practitioners should take steps to reduce the high number of medication-related patient calls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7823226     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  8 in total

Review 1.  You've got a lot to answer for, Mr Bell. A review of the use of the telephone in primary care.

Authors:  L Hallam
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  The nature and content of physician telephone calls in a private practice.

Authors:  D C Spencer; A J Daugird
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  What annoys me most. The telephone.

Authors:  O Samuel
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-11-26

4.  After-hours telephone calls in private family practice.

Authors:  T R Mayer; L Solberg; M Seifert; P Cole
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Telephone medicine: a general internal medicine experience.

Authors:  B E Johnson; C A Johnson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The after-hours call in family practice.

Authors:  P Curtis; A Talbot
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  After-hours calls: a five-year longitudinal study in a family practice group.

Authors:  J J Bergman; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  The nature and management of telephone utilization in a family practice setting.

Authors:  P M Fischer; S R Smith
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 0.493

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Things that ring in the night.

Authors:  J E Casanova
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Preventing communication errors in telephone medicine.

Authors:  Anna B Reisman; Karen E Brown
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patient safety and telephone medicine : some lessons from closed claim case review.

Authors:  Harvey P Katz; Dawn Kaltsounis; Liz Halloran; Maureen Mondor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Outcomes of telephone medical care.

Authors:  H Delichatsios; M Callahan; M Charlson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.