Literature DB >> 7823223

Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

N S Wenger1, R K Oye, P E Bellamy, J Lynn, R S Phillips, N A Desbiens, P Kussin, S J Youngner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the appropriateness of hospitalization as the time to elicit patients' medical care preferences, the authors evaluated the capability of seriously ill patients to participate in decision making early in hospitalization and their decision making capacity two weeks before hospital entry.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with retrospective evaluation of preadmission decision making capacity.
SETTING: Five acute care teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Four thousand three hundred one acutely ill hospitalized adults meeting predetermined severity of illness criteria in nine specific disease categories. MEASUREMENTS: Surrogate decision makers' estimates of the prior mental capacities of patients unable to be interviewed early in hospitalization about care preferences due to intubation, coma, or cognitive impairment. Comparison of the demographics, degrees of sickness at admission, and outcomes of interviewable vs noninterviewable patients. MAIN
RESULTS: Forty percent of the patients were not interviewable concerning preferences. Of these, 83% could have participated in treatment decisions two weeks prior to hospitalization. The patients who were not interviewable were more acutely ill, had less chronic disease, and were more likely to die during hospitalization than the interviewable patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Many acutely ill patients likely to die in the hospital lost their ability to make medical care decisions around the time of hospital admission. Preferences for care and advance directives should be discussed in the outpatient setting or very early in hospital admission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT)

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7823223     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  12 in total

1.  SUPPORT: Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Study design.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Patient characteristics in SUPPORT: activity status and cognitive function.

Authors:  R S Phillips; L Goldman; M Bergner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Advance directives on admission. Clinical implications and analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.

Authors:  J La Puma; D Orentlicher; R J Moss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Patient Self-Determination Act. On balance, more help than hindrance.

Authors:  M L White; J C Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Advancing the cause of advance directives.

Authors:  P A Singer; M Siegler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-01

6.  Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.

Authors:  N G Smedira; B H Evans; L S Grais; N H Cohen; B Lo; M Cooke; W P Schecter; C Fink; E Epstein-Jaffe; C May
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Beyond the living will.

Authors:  M Henderson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1990-08

8.  Epidemiology of no-code orders in an academic hospital.

Authors:  R F Uhlmann; W J McDonald; T S Inui
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-01

9.  The do-not-resuscitate order. Still too little too late.

Authors:  K Gleeson; S Wise
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-05

10.  Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?

Authors:  S E Bedell; D Pelle; P L Maher; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

1.  Timing of Survey Administration After Hospice Patient Death: Stability of Bereaved Respondents.

Authors:  Eleanor L DiBiasio; Melissa A Clark; Pedro L Gozalo; Carol Spence; David J Casarett; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Preferences of physicians and their patients for end-of-life care.

Authors:  G P Gramelspacher; X H Zhou; M P Hanna; W M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care?

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; M Dwyer; E Marx
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Advance planning for advance directives.

Authors:  A Alpers; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care.

Authors:  W M Tierney; P R Dexter; G P Gramelspacher; A J Perkins; X H Zhou; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Criteria for patient decision making (in)competence: a review of and commentary on some empirical approaches.

Authors:  S P Welie
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

7.  Missed opportunities: use of an end-of-life symptom management order protocol among inpatients dying expected deaths.

Authors:  Anne M Walling; Susan L Ettner; Tod Barry; Myrtle C Yamamoto; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  End-of-life decision-making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference?

Authors:  Joachim Cohen; Johan Bilsen; Susanne Fischer; Rurik Löfmark; Michael Norup; Agnes van der Heide; Guido Miccinesi; Luc Deliens
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Older patient engagement in advance care planning in Canadian primary care practices: Results of a multisite survey.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Carrie Bernard; Doug Klein; Amy Tan; Marissa Slaven; Doris Barwich; John J You; Gabriel Asselin; Jessica Simon; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Effect of an Interactive Website to Engage Patients in Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Settings.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Carole A Robinson; Michael McKenzie; Gillian Fyles; Rebecca L Sudore; Elizabeth Andersen; Neha Arora; Doris Barwich; Carrie Bernard; Dawn Elston; Rebecca Heyland; Doug Klein; Erin McFee; Lawrence Mroz; Marissa Slaven; Amy Tan; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.