Literature DB >> 7823098

Encoding of amplitude and rate of forces applied to the teeth by human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents.

M Trulsson1, R S Johansson.   

Abstract

1. The encoding of force amplitude and force rate by human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents was studied. Recordings were obtained from 19 single periodontal afferents in the inferior alveolar nerve with the use of tungsten microelectrodes. Loads consisting of a force increase (loading ramp), a phase of maintained force (static phase), and a force decrease (unloading ramp) were applied to the receptor bearing tooth, which was most often an incisor. The static forces applied ranged between 0.05 and 5 N, and the rate of force applied during the loading ramps ranged between 0.4 and 70 N/s. The forces were primarily applied in one of six directions (lingual, labial, mesial, distal, upward, or downward) that evoked the greatest discharge activity. 2. For each force application, the steady-state response was defined as the mean discharge rate during a 1-s period starting 0.5 s after the end of the loading ramp. Most afferents (15/19) exhibited a "hyperbolic" (viz., negatively accelerating) relationship between the amplitude of the stimulation force and the steady-state response, featuring a pronounced saturation tendency: the highest sensitivity to changes in static force was observed at force levels below 1 N. At higher force levels the sensitivity gradually diminished. Moreover, the dynamic sensitivity similarly decreased with increasing amplitude of static background force. For a subsample of afferents studied, comparable stimulus-response relationships were obtained in directions other than the most responsive one, but the discharge rates were lower. 3. In contrast to the response of most afferents, four (4/19) differed in that they consistently exhibited a nearly linear relationship between force amplitude and the steady-state response. Moreover, these afferents maintained their dynamic sensitivity as the amplitude of the background force was increased. 4. The steady-state response of all afferents was well described as a constant times F/ (F + c), where F represents the steady-state force, and c the force generating one-half the estimated maximum discharge rate that could be evoked by steady-state force stimulation. The c-parameter was on average 0.42 N (range 0.05-1.1 N) for the afferents exhibiting hyperbolic stimulus-response relationships. In contrast it ranged between 5 and 22 N for those exhibiting "nearly linear" relationships. A hypothetical model of the mechanics of the periodontal ligament supporting the F/(F + c) transform is proposed. 5. A general transfer function was developed to predict the instantaneous discharge rate of an individual afferent to arbitrary force profiles applied to the receptor bearing tooth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7823098     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.4.1734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  EMG, force and discharge rate analysis of human jaw reflexes in response to axial stimulation of the incisor.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Forces applied by the incisors and roles of periodontal afferents during food-holding and -biting tasks.

Authors:  M Trulsson; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cortical activation resulting from the stimulation of periodontal mechanoreceptors measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Authors:  P Habre-Hallage; L Dricot; L Hermoye; H Reychler; D van Steenberghe; R Jacobs; C B Grandin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dental abrasion as a cutting process.

Authors:  Peter W Lucas; Mark Wagner; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Shaji Michael; Lidia A Thai; David S Strait; Michael V Swain; Adam van Casteren; Waleed M Renno; Ali Shekeban; Swapna M Philip; Sreeja Saji; Anthony G Atkins
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Forces applied by anterior and posterior teeth and roles of periodontal afferents during hold-and-split tasks in human subjects.

Authors:  Skjalg E Johnsen; Krister G Svensson; Mats Trulsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Response of human jaw muscles to axial stimulation of the incisor.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker; Andrew W Savundra
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Prefrontal cortex activity induced by periodontal afferent inputs downregulates occlusal force.

Authors:  Takahiro Kishimoto; Takaharu Goto; Tetsuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Short-term follow-up of masticatory adaptation after rehabilitation with an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis: a pilot assessment.

Authors:  Mihoko Tanaka; Collaert Bruno; Reinhilde Jacobs; Tetsurou Torisu; Hiroshi Murata
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-03-07

9.  The influence of gender and bruxism on human minimum interdental threshold ability.

Authors:  Patrícia dos Santos Calderon; Evelyn Mikaela Kogawa; Lívia dos Santos Corpas; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Paulo César Rodrigues Conti
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Fine motor control of the jaw following alteration of orofacial afferent inputs.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Eduardo Castrillon; Mats Trulsson; Krister G Svensson; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.