Literature DB >> 27274807

Dental abrasion as a cutting process.

Peter W Lucas1, Mark Wagner2, Khaled Al-Fadhalah3, Abdulwahab S Almusallam4, Shaji Michael1, Lidia A Thai5, David S Strait6, Michael V Swain1, Adam van Casteren7, Waleed M Renno8, Ali Shekeban5, Swapna M Philip1, Sreeja Saji1, Anthony G Atkins9.   

Abstract

A mammalian tooth is abraded when a sliding contact between a particle and the tooth surface leads to an immediate loss of tooth tissue. Over time, these contacts can lead to wear serious enough to impair the oral processing of food. Both anatomical and physiological mechanisms have evolved in mammals to try to prevent wear, indicating its evolutionary importance, but it is still an established survival threat. Here we consider that many wear marks result from a cutting action whereby the contacting tip(s) of such wear particles acts akin to a tool tip. Recent theoretical developments show that it is possible to estimate the toughness of abraded materials via cutting tests. Here, we report experiments intended to establish the wear resistance of enamel in terms of its toughness and how friction varies. Imaging via atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to assess the damage involved. Damage ranged from pure plastic deformation to fracture with and without lateral microcracks. Grooves cut with a Berkovich diamond were the most consistent, suggesting that the toughness of enamel in cutting is 244 J m(-2), which is very high. Friction was higher in the presence of a polyphenolic compound, indicating that this could increase wear potential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; cutting; dental function; dental wear; mammalian diets

Year:  2016        PMID: 27274807      PMCID: PMC4843630          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  55 in total

1.  New model to explain tooth wear with implications for microwear formation and diet reconstruction.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Jing Zheng; Diaodiao Huang; Z Ryan Tian; Lei Chen; Zhongrong Zhou; Peter S Ungar; Linmao Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Simulation of dental microwear: Characteristic traces by opal phytoliths give clues to ancient human dietary behavior.

Authors:  I L Gügel; G Grupe; K H Kunzelmann
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  The organic elements of the enamel; the gross morphology and the histological relationship of the lamellae to the organic framework of the enamel.

Authors:  R F SOGNNAES
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Complex dental structure and wear biomechanics in hadrosaurid dinosaurs.

Authors:  Gregory M Erickson; Brandon A Krick; Matthew Hamilton; Gerald R Bourne; Mark A Norell; Erica Lilleodden; W Gregory Sawyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  In vivo and in vitro turnover in dental microwear.

Authors:  M F Teaford; O J Oyen
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Sea otter dental enamel is highly resistant to chipping due to its microstructure.

Authors:  Charles Ziscovici; Peter W Lucas; Paul J Constantino; Timothy G Bromage; Adam van Casteren
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Saliva tannin interactions.

Authors:  J F Prinz; P W Lucas
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 8.  Interaction of plant polyphenols with salivary proteins.

Authors:  Anders Bennick
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  2002

9.  Dental microwear patterns of extant and extinct Muridae (Rodentia, Mammalia): ecological implications.

Authors:  Helder Gomes Rodrigues; Gildas Merceron; Laurent Viriot
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-01-06

10.  Structure and scale of the mechanics of mammalian dental enamel viewed from an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Peter W Lucas; Swapna M Philip; Dareen Al-Qeoud; Nuha Al-Draihim; Sreeja Saji; Adam van Casteren
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Sascha Senck; Brian A Villmoare; Amanda L Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Brian G Richmond; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross; Ian R Grosse; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Stefano Benazzi; Kristian J Carlson; Keely B Carlson; Leslie C Pryor McIntosh; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Fracture mechanics, enamel thickness and the evolution of molar form in hominins.

Authors:  Gary T Schwartz; Amanda McGrosky; David S Strait
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Evidence that metallic proxies are unsuitable for assessing the mechanics of microwear formation and a new theory of the meaning of microwear.

Authors:  Adam van Casteren; Peter W Lucas; David S Strait; Shaji Michael; Nick Bierwisch; Norbert Schwarzer; Khaled J Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Lidia A Thai; Sreeja Saji; Ali Shekeban; Michael V Swain
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Neutron scanning reveals unexpected complexity in the enamel thickness of an herbivorous Jurassic reptile.

Authors:  Marc E H Jones; Peter W Lucas; Abigail S Tucker; Amy P Watson; Joseph J W Sertich; John R Foster; Ruth Williams; Ulf Garbe; Joseph J Bevitt; Floriana Salvemini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.