Literature DB >> 7822775

Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies.

S R Shi1, S A Imam, L Young, R J Cote, C R Taylor.   

Abstract

Antigen retrieval (AR) incorporating high-temperature microwave (MW) heating of tissue sections before immunostaining is a revolutionary technique that can unmask the antigens in formalin-fixed tissue sections, thus making them available for immunohistochemical staining. Although high temperature is believed to be the primary mechanism in retrieval of antigens, a variety of chemical solutions have been tested to define an optimal AR solution. We tested the hypothesis that pH of the AR solution may influence the quality of immunostaining by using seven different AR buffer solutions at a series of different pH values ranging from 1 to 10. We evaluated the staining of monoclonal antibodies to cytoplasmic antigens (AE1, HMB45, NSE), nuclear antigens (MIB-1, PCNA, ER), and cell surface antigens (MT1, L26, EMA) on routinely formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections under different pH conditions with MW heating for 10 min. The intensity of immunostaining was graded in a blinded fashion. The pH value of the AR buffer solution was carefully measured before, immediately after, and 15 min after the AR procedure. The influence of pH on AR immunohistochemical staining can be summarized into three patterns. Some antigens (L26, PCNA, AE1, EMA, and NSE) showed excellent retrieval throughout the pH range. Other antigens (MIB1 and ER) showed strong intensity of immunohistochemical staining at very low pH and at neutral to high pH, but a dramatic decrease in the intensity of the AR immunostaining at moderately acidic pH (pH 3-6). Still others (MT1 and HMB45) showed increasing intensity of the AR immunostaining with increasing pH, but only weak immunostaining at low pH. Among the seven buffer solutions at any given pH value, the intensity of AR immunostaining was very similar. However, Tris-HCl buffer tended to produce better results at higher pH, compared with other buffers. Although high-temperature heating is believed to be the most important factor for the AR technique, the pH value of the AR solution is an important co-factor for some antigens. Optimization of the AR system should therefore include optimization of the pH of the AR solution. Our results indicate that AR immunostaining of Tris-HCl or sodium acetate buffer at pH 8-9 may be suitable for most antigens, although certain nuclear antigens show optimal staining at low pH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7822775     DOI: 10.1177/43.2.7822775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  47 in total

1.  Identification of dysplasia in human colonic aberrant crypt foci.

Authors:  I M Siu; T G Pretlow; S B Amini; T P Pretlow
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Rapid immunocytochemistry with simple heat-induced antigen retrieval technique for improvement in the quality of cytological diagnosis.

Authors:  Tamami Denda; Shingo Kamoshida; Jumpei Kawamura; Kunihiko Harada; Kenji Kawai; Sadahito Kuwao; Motoji Sawabe
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  IL2 Inducible T-cell Kinase, a Novel Therapeutic Target in Melanoma.

Authors:  Craig C Carson; Stergios J Moschos; Sharon N Edmiston; David B Darr; Nana Nikolaishvili-Feinberg; Pamela A Groben; Xin Zhou; Pei Fen Kuan; Shaily Pandey; Keefe T Chan; Jamie L Jordan; Honglin Hao; Jill S Frank; Dennis A Hopkinson; David C Gibbs; Virginia D Alldredge; Eloise Parrish; Sara C Hanna; Paula Berkowitz; David S Rubenstein; C Ryan Miller; James E Bear; David W Ollila; Norman E Sharpless; Kathleen Conway; Nancy E Thomas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of neovascularization in tumor xenografts.

Authors:  D Wang; C R Stockard; L Harkins; P Lott; C Salih; K Yuan; D Buchsbaum; A Hashim; M Zayzafoon; R W Hardy; O Hameed; W Grizzle; G P Siegal
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Selection of buffer pH by the isoelectric point of the antigen for the efficient heat-induced epitope retrieval: re-appraisal for nuclear protein pathobiology.

Authors:  Hanako Kajiya; Susumu Takekoshi; Mao Takei; Noboru Egashira; Takashi Miyakoshi; Akihito Serizawa; Akira Teramoto; Robert Y Osamura
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Localization of a wide-ranging panel of antigens in the rat retina by immunohistochemistry: comparison of Davidson's solution and formalin as fixatives.

Authors:  Glyn Chidlow; Mark Daymon; John P M Wood; Robert J Casson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  The host environment determines strain-specific differences in the timing of skeletal muscle regeneration: cross-transplantation studies between SJL/J and BALB/c mice.

Authors:  P Roberts; J K McGeachie; M D Grounds
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Antigen retrieval, signal amplification and intensification in immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  M Werner; R Von Wasielewski; P Komminoth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.304

9.  Heat-induced antigen retrieval for immunohistochemical reactions in routinely processed paraffin sections.

Authors:  Laszlo Krenacs; Tibor Krenacs; Eva Stelkovics; Mark Raffeld
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

10.  Impaired hepatocyte regeneration in toll-like receptor 4 mutant mice.

Authors:  Grace L Su; Stewart C Wang; Alireza Aminlari; George L Tipoe; Lars Steinstraesser; Amin Nanji
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.