Literature DB >> 7822602

The function of home visits in maternal and child welfare as evaluated by service providers and users.

K Vehviläinen-Julkunen1.   

Abstract

This study looks at how public health nurses and clients of maternal and child welfare clinics evaluate the function and meaning of home visits. Another concern is with the options available to the service user. The data were collected during November and December 1992 from a total of 203 health centres across Finland; responses were obtained from 263 public health nurses and 323 clients. The results are presented in the form of frequencies, percentages and cross tabulations. According to the results, the clients felt that the most important function of home visits was to have a competent professional examination of the newborn. They also attached much importance to the information function, i.e. learning about the growth and care of small children. The public health nurses, on the other hand, felt that the most important function of home visits was to support and encourage parents and to ensure the continuity of care. The advantages of meeting in the client's home environment were equally stressed by both sides. By contrast, clients and public health nurses had very different views on the options available to the client. Almost all nurses said that the client can freely choose between home visits and visiting the clinic; however, only about half the clients felt they could choose the service they best preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7822602     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20040672.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  3 in total

1.  The views of professionals toward infant growth.

Authors:  Patricia Lucas; Catherine Law; Janis Baird; Helen Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth.

Authors:  P Lucas; L Arai; J Baird; J Kleijnen; C Law; H Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Patricia J Lucas; Janis Baird; Lisa Arai; Catherine Law; Helen M Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.