OBJECTIVE: To test whether handedness is associated with a change in longevity. DESIGN: Archival survey. SETTING: British Isles. SUBJECTS: All first class cricketers born before 1961 whose bowling hand was specified (right, n = 5041; left, n = 1132) in a comprehensive encyclopaedia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowling hand and life span. RESULTS: Regression analysis of the 5960 players born between 1840 and 1960 (3387 dead, 2573 alive) showed no significant relation between mortality and handedness (P = 0.3). Left handedness was, however, associated with an increased likelihood of death from unnatural causes (P = 0.03, log hazard 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.70). This effect was especially related to deaths during warfare (P = 0.009, log hazard 0.53, 0.13 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Left handedness is not, in general, associated with an increase in mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether handedness is associated with a change in longevity. DESIGN: Archival survey. SETTING: British Isles. SUBJECTS: All first class cricketers born before 1961 whose bowling hand was specified (right, n = 5041; left, n = 1132) in a comprehensive encyclopaedia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowling hand and life span. RESULTS: Regression analysis of the 5960 players born between 1840 and 1960 (3387 dead, 2573 alive) showed no significant relation between mortality and handedness (P = 0.3). Left handedness was, however, associated with an increased likelihood of death from unnatural causes (P = 0.03, log hazard 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.70). This effect was especially related to deaths during warfare (P = 0.009, log hazard 0.53, 0.13 to 0.92). CONCLUSION:Left handedness is not, in general, associated with an increase in mortality.
Authors: Derek J Roberts; Richard I Hall; Yan Wang; Lisa C Julien; Jeremy Wood; Kerry B Goralski Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 6.713