Literature DB >> 7819855

Use of personal medical records for research purposes.

N Wald1, M Law, T Meade, G Miller, E Alberman, J Dickinson.   

Abstract

The established practice of doctors using medical records for research purposes is threatened by the recent proposed guidelines from the Department of Health, the BMA, and the European Commission. The European Commission has proposed that explicit consent should be obtained from each patient before his or her medical records can be used; the proposals from the Department of Health and the BMA would require all research that needs access to personal medical records to be submitted to an ethics committee. We believe that these proposals would seriously impair an entire category of research and suggest therefore that another set of guidelines, proposed by a Royal College of Physicians' working group, should be used to modify the proposals. The guidelines of the working group encourage the use of medical records for research and ensure that such use can be made in a confidential manner without causing harm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; British Medical Association; Department of Health (Great Britain); European Commission; Royal College of Physicians

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819855      PMCID: PMC2541335          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Draft bill aims at improving confidentiality.

Authors:  Dan Beales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-06

2.  Prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida and anencephaly by maternal serum-alpha-fetoprotein measurement. A controlled study.

Authors:  N J Wald; D J Brock; J Bonnar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Investigation of relation between use of oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  M P Vessey; R Doll
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-04-27

4.  Mortality from cancer and other causes after radiotherapy for ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  W M Brown; R Doll
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1965-12-04

5.  Randomised trial of high doses of stilboestrol and ethisterone in pregnancy: long-term follow-up of mothers.

Authors:  V Beral; L Colwell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-25

6.  Congenital talipes and hip malformation in relation to amniocentesis: a case-control study.

Authors:  N J Wald; E Terzian; P A Vickers; J A Weatherall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Analysis of limb reduction defects in babies exposed to chorionic villus sampling.

Authors:  H V Firth; P A Boyd; P F Chamberlain; I Z MacKenzie; G M Morriss-Kay; S M Huson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein measurement: a screening test for Down syndrome.

Authors:  H S Cuckle; N J Wald; R H Lindenbaum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-04-28       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  The use of medical records in research: what do patients want?

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Marvin R Natowicz; Sara Chandros Hull; Ruth R Faden; Laura Plantinga; Lawrence O Gostin; Julia Slutsman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Informed consent. Numbers inform the debate.

Authors:  M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-03

3.  Use of personal records for research purposes. Guidelines may affect audit.

Authors:  A N Stark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

4.  Use of personal records for research purposes. Restrictions unnecessary and obstructive.

Authors:  J E Haddow; G E Palomaki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

5.  Use of personal records for research purposes. Records prematurely destroyed.

Authors:  M M Hawkins; A W Craft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

6.  Use of personal records for research purposes. Identification numbers help maintain confidentiality.

Authors:  L Edouard; N S Rawson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

7.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M R Robling; K Hood; H Houston; R Pill; J Fay; H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Can patients with low health literacy be identified from routine primary care health records? A cross-sectional and prospective analysis.

Authors:  Paul Campbell; Martyn Lewis; Ying Chen; Rosie J Lacey; Gillian Rowlands; Joanne Protheroe
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.