Literature DB >> 7818504

Binding of quinomycin antibiotic UK-65,662 to DNA: 1H-n.m.r. studies of drug-induced changes in DNA conformation in complexes with d(ACGT)2 and d(GACGTC)2.

M S Searle1.   

Abstract

Quinomycin antibiotic UK-65,662 binds selectively to the 5'-CpG-binding sites of the DNA duplexes d(ACGT)2 and d(GACGTC)2; the complexes have been studied in detail by 1H-n.m.r. spectroscopy and molecular-modelling techniques employing nuclear Overhauser effect-restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics. Whereas the terminal A.T base pairs of the tetamer duplex d(ACGT)2 adopt a stable Hoogsteen alignment (characterized by a syn glycosidic conformation of the purine base), when internalized within the hexamer duplex d(GACGTC)2, the A.T base pairs revert to anti glycosidic torsion angles characteristic of the Watson-Crick hydrogen-bonding scheme. The energetics of base-pair stacking at the terminal 5'-GpA steps of the hexamer complex, with base pairs in the Watson-Crick alignment, are concluded to be important determinants of the adopted conformation, whereas an energetic preference for stacking interactions between terminal Hoogsteen A.T base pairs and the drug quinoline chromophores is evident in the tetramer complex. The internal G.C base pairs in both complexes are highly stabilized, as indicated by the very slow exchange rates of the guanine imino protons; in contrast, the flanking A.T base pairs are no more stable than in the ligand-free DNA duplexes. A large number of intermolecular nuclear Overhauser effects are indicative of many van der Waals contacts and hydrogen-bonding between the antibiotic and the minor groove of the central G.C base pairs in both complexes, indicating that interactions with the G.C base pairs in each duplex are very similar providing the essential features for recognition and tight binding. Despite the difference in the conformation of the A.T base pairs, stacking with the quinoline rings occurs primarily with the adenine bases in both complexes. Relative intensities of intranucleotide versus internucleotide nuclear Overhauser effects indicate that both duplexes are substantially unwound by drug binding (particularly at the CpG step) and this is confirmed by the structure calculations. Both duplexes have ladder-like structures that must lead to significant local distortions of the DNA conformation in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7818504      PMCID: PMC1137427          DOI: 10.1042/bj3040967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  22 in total

1.  NMR studies of echinomycin bisintercalation complexes with d(A1-C2-G3-T4) and d(T1-C2-G3-A4) duplexes in aqueous solution: sequence-dependent formation of Hoogsteen A1.T4 and Watson--Crick T1.A4 base pairs flanking the bisintercalation site.

Authors:  X L Gao; D J Patel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-03-08       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Proton NMR study of the [d(ACGTATACGT)]2-2echinomycin complex: conformational changes between echinomycin binding sites.

Authors:  D E Gilbert; J Feigon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Hoogsteen base pairs proximal and distal to echinomycin binding sites on DNA.

Authors:  D Mendel; P B Dervan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Unstable Hoogsteen base pairs adjacent to echinomycin binding sites within a DNA duplex.

Authors:  D E Gilbert; G A van der Marel; J H van Boom; J Feigon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Non-Watson-Crick G.C and A.T base pairs in a DNA-antibiotic complex.

Authors:  G J Quigley; G Ughetto; G A van der Marel; J H van Boom; A H Wang; A Rich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A comparison of the structure of echinomycin and triostin A complexed to a DNA fragment.

Authors:  G Ughetto; A H Wang; G J Quigley; G A van der Marel; J H van Boom; A Rich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Echinomycin binding sites on DNA.

Authors:  M M Van Dyke; P B Dervan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Base specificity in the interaction of polynucleotides with antibiotic drugs.

Authors:  D C Ward; E Reich; I H Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  UK-63,052 complex, new quinomycin antibiotics from Streptomyces braegensis subsp. japonicus; taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, characterisation and antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  M J Rance; J C Ruddock; M S Pacey; W P Cullen; L H Huang; M T Jefferson; E B Whipple; H Maeda; J Tone
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  The molecular structure of a DNA-triostin A complex.

Authors:  A H Wang; G Ughetto; G J Quigley; T Hakoshima; G A van der Marel; J H van Boom; A Rich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.