Literature DB >> 7816942

The potential and limitations of the inverse radiotherapy technique.

R Mohan1, X Wang, A Jackson, T Bortfeld, A L Boyer, G J Kutcher, S A Leibel, Z Fuks, C C Ling.   

Abstract

The objective of the work presented in this paper is to explore the scope of the applicability of the inverse radiotherapy technique for designing optimized intensity distributions to achieve a desired dose distribution. A specified desired uniform dose to the target volume is inverted, subject to constraints on the surrounding normal tissue dose, to produce optimum intensity distributions in a set of beams arranged around the target volume. We employed the inverse technique and software developed by Bortfeld and evaluated results both qualitatively and quantitatively using dose distribution displays, dose-volume histograms and biological indices including tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probabilities. So far we have applied this methodology to prostate and lung treatment plans. For prostate the inverse technique produces satisfactory approximations of the desired dose distributions. However, for lung its performance is considerably inferior. Our investigations point to a number of factors for this difference, the primary ones being differences in the tolerance doses of neighboring normal tissues, magnitudes of volume effect, tissue architectures, and the achievability of the specified desired dose distributions. We conclude that, for certain clinical situations, it is not sufficient to specify the objectives of optimization purely in terms of the desired pattern of the dose. The objectives must also include dose-volume effects and biological indices. Furthermore, the mathematics of optimization must be able to incorporate these factors into the process. We find that the inverse technique is not suitable for situations where dose-volume considerations and biological indices are important and that other methods of optimization of intensity distributions should be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7816942     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90023-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  12 in total

1.  Risk-adaptive optimization: selective boosting of high-risk tumor subvolumes.

Authors:  Yusung Kim; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Is it beneficial to selectively boost high-risk tumor subvolumes? A comparison of selectively boosting high-risk tumor subvolumes versus homogeneous dose escalation of the entire tumor based on equivalent EUD plans.

Authors:  Yusung Kim; Wolfgang A Tome
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Inverse radiotherapy planning for a concave-convex PTV in cervical and upper mediastinal regions. Simulation of radiotherapy using an Alderson-RANDO phantom. Planning target volume.

Authors:  O Esik; T Bortfeld; R Bendl; G Németh; W Schlegel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  [Which factors modify the reproducibility of patient positioning in the daily irradiation routine?].

Authors:  C Thilmann; I A Adamietz; S Mose; F Saran; A Buchner; H D Böttcher
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  A predictive model to guide management of the overlap region between target volume and organs at risk in prostate cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Malcolm D Mattes; Jennifer C Lee; Sara Elnaiem; Adel Guirguis; N C Ikoro; Hani Ashamalla
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2014-03-27

Review 6.  Concurrent chemoradiation for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin T Cooper; Nicholas J Sanfilippo
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-10

7.  Comparison of three radiotherapy treatment planning protocols of definitive external-beam radiation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  SuYu Zhu; Takashi Mizowaki; Yasushi Nagata; Kenji Takayama; Yoshiki Norihisa; Shinsuke Yano; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Original Knee Fixation Device as a Useful Fixation Method during Prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kuga; Katsutoshi Shirieda; Yuta Sato; Haruhiko Shimotabira; Yusuke Kurogi; Takashi Jinnouchi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31

9.  Compensators: an alternative IMRT delivery technique.

Authors:  Sha X Chang; Timothy J Cullip; Katharin M Deschesne; Elizabeth P Miller; Julian G Rosenman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Selection of external beam radiotherapy approaches for precise and accurate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Hiroki Shirato; Quynh-Thu Le; Keiji Kobashi; Anussara Prayongrat; Seishin Takao; Shinichi Shimizu; Amato Giaccia; Lei Xing; Kikuo Umegaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.