Literature DB >> 24724048

A predictive model to guide management of the overlap region between target volume and organs at risk in prostate cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Malcolm D Mattes1, Jennifer C Lee1, Sara Elnaiem1, Adel Guirguis1, N C Ikoro1, Hani Ashamalla1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to determine whether the magnitude of overlap between planning target volume (PTV) and rectum (Rectumoverlap) or PTV and bladder (Bladderoverlap) in prostate cancer volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is predictive of the dose-volume relationships achieved after optimization, and to identify predictive equations and cutoff values using these overlap volumes beyond which the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) dose-volume constraints are unlikely to be met.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with prostate cancer underwent VMAT planning using identical optimization conditions and normalization. The PTV (for the 50.4 Gy primary plan and 30.6 Gy boost plan) included 5 to 10 mm margins around the prostate and seminal vesicles. Pearson correlations, linear regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to correlate the percentage overlap with dose-volume parameters.
RESULTS: The percentage Rectumoverlap and Bladderoverlap correlated with sparing of that organ but minimally impacted other dose-volume parameters, predicted the primary plan rectum V45 and bladder V50 with R(2) = 0.78 and R(2) = 0.83, respectively, and predicted the boost plan rectum V30 and bladder V30 with R(2) = 0.53 and R(2) = 0.81, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of boost Rectumoverlap to predict rectum V75 >15% was 3.5% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%, p < 0.01), and the optimal cutoff value of boost Bladderoverlap to predict bladder V80 >10% was 5.0% (sensitivity 83%, specificity 100%, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The degree of overlap between PTV and bladder or rectum can be used to accurately guide physicians on the use of interventions to limit the extent of the overlap region prior to optimization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer assisted radiotherapy planning; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Organs at risk; Prostate cancers; Radiation injuries

Year:  2014        PMID: 24724048      PMCID: PMC3977128          DOI: 10.3857/roj.2014.32.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol J        ISSN: 2234-1900


  29 in total

1.  Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck?

Authors:  K A Vineberg; A Eisbruch; M M Coselmon; D L McShan; M L Kessler; B A Fraass
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.

Authors:  G O De Meerleer; L A Vakaet; W R De Gersem; C De Wagter; B De Naeyer; W De Neve
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Application of a spacer gel to optimize three-dimensional conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Nuria Escobar Corral; Mariana Caffaro; Marc D Piroth; Richard Holy; Victoria Djukic; Gundula Otto; Felix Schoth; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Kevin L Moore; R Scott Brame; Daniel A Low; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.

Authors:  Lindsey M Appenzoller; Jeff M Michalski; Wade L Thorstad; Sasa Mutic; Kevin L Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  An overlap-volume-histogram based method for rectal dose prediction and automated treatment planning in the external beam prostate radiotherapy following hydrogel injection.

Authors:  Yidong Yang; Eric C Ford; Binbin Wu; Michael Pinkawa; Baukelien van Triest; Patrick Campbell; Danny Y Song; Todd R McNutt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: biopsy strategy implications.

Authors:  M E Chen; D A Johnston; K Tang; R J Babaian; P Troncoso
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; L Happersett; H J Lee; C C Ling; C M Burman; M Hunt; T Wolfe; E S Venkatraman; A Jackson; M Skwarchuk; S A Leibel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control.

Authors:  Binbin Wu; Francesco Ricchetti; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Misha Kazhdan; Patricio Simari; Ming Chuang; Russell Taylor; Robert Jacques; Todd McNutt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tree-based exploration of the optimization objectives for automatic cervical cancer IMRT treatment planning.

Authors:  Hanlin Wang; Ruoxi Wang; Jiacheng Liu; Jian Zhang; Kaining Yao; Haizhen Yue; Yibao Zhang; Jing You; Hao Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.629

2.  The effect of extremely narrow MLC leaf width on the plan quality of VMAT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; So-Yeon Park; Jin Ho Kim; Joel Carlson; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.481

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.