Literature DB >> 7812020

Subjective weighting of disability: an approach to quality of life assessment in rehabilitation.

H Laman1, G J Lankhorst.   

Abstract

The impact of various disabilities may differ greatly from individual to individual. Therefore, for a full assessment of a rehabilitee, objective aspects of disability should be supplemented with disability perception. The purpose of this study was to construct a self-administered questionnaire of 39 abilities/activities based on the ICIDH D-code, with parallel questions about '(dis)ability' and 'impact'. The instrument was used to obtain data from 60 disabled people. Fifty forms (83%) were returned from 25 patients with spinal cord injury and 25 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mean time to fill out the questionnaire was 24 minutes. A first attempt to validate the 'weighted score' with an open question about the most negative aspects of the disease showed a (very) good correspondence in 74%. An information gain as a result of the impact question was noted in 44%. This instrument has attractive properties for clinical use and research purposes in rehabilitation medicine. It was developed for the identification of needs of individual patients. The 'weighted scores' allow the setting of priorities in an individually tailored rehabilitation programme. Future applications might include monitoring the progress of a rehabilitee and identification of group needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7812020     DOI: 10.3109/09638289409166613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of responsiveness indices in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  L E Pfennings; H M van der Ploeg; L Cohen; C H Polman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa A Simpson; Janice J Eng; Jane T C Hsieh; Dalton L Wolfe
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients.

Authors:  Fons J Trompenaars; Erik D Masthoff; Guus L Van Heck; Paul P Hodiamont; Jolanda De Vries
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Relationships between demographic variables and quality of life in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients.

Authors:  Fons J Trompenaars; E D Masthoff; G L Van Heck; P P Hodiamont; J De Vries
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Factor structure of the Disability and Impact Profile in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L Cohen; F Pouwer; L E Pfennings; G J Lankhorst; H M van der Ploeg; C H Polman; H J Adèr; A Jønnson; L Vleugels
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public.

Authors:  S Hewlett; A P Smith; J R Kirwan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.

Authors:  P Bragge; L Piccenna; J W Middleton; S Williams; G Creasey; S Dunlop; D Brown; R L Gruen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the disability and impact profile (DIP).

Authors:  G J Lankhorst; F Jelles; R C Smits; C H Polman; D J Kuik; L E Pfennings; L Cohen; H M van der Ploeg; P Ketelaer; L Vleugels
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.849

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.