Literature DB >> 10457747

Factor structure of the Disability and Impact Profile in patients with multiple sclerosis.

L Cohen1, F Pouwer, L E Pfennings, G J Lankhorst, H M van der Ploeg, C H Polman, H J Adèr, A Jønnson, L Vleugels.   

Abstract

The Disability and Impact Profile (DIP) is used for the measurement of quality of life in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Data from 211 persons with definite MS from Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands were used to address three questions. To what extent do the impairment ratings and their complementary weighted scores share common variance? What is the factor structure of the weighted scores? To what extent do disease-related information and information from psychological questionnaires offer concurrent validity for the factors? Correlations between impairment ratings and the weighted item scores were high; for most items the complementary ratings of impact do not supplement information provided by impairment ratings. The DIP weighted scores can be represented to some extent by three independent dimensions: a motor (skeletal movement) or displacement ability factor, a factor relating to sensory-cognitive intactness and a psychological well-being factor. A two-factor solution provides a first factor identical to that of the three-factor solution and a second factor representing psychological well-being. The two factors correlate well with instruments measuring disability and with satisfaction versus emotional distress. Provisional scales based on the factors were constructed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10457747     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026481029191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  9 in total

1.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

2.  Psychological functioning in primary progressive versus secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L Vleugels; L Pfennings; F Pouwer; L Cohen; P Ketelaer; C Polman; G Lankhorst; H van der Ploeg
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1998-03

3.  The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale.

Authors:  A T Beck; A Weissman; D Lester; L Trexler
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1974-12

4.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  F D Lublin; S C Reingold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the disability and impact profile (DIP).

Authors:  G J Lankhorst; F Jelles; R C Smits; C H Polman; D J Kuik; L E Pfennings; L Cohen; H M van der Ploeg; P Ketelaer; L Vleugels
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

Authors:  J F Kurtzke
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Brain MRI correlates of cognitive impairment in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Comi; M Filippi; V Martinelli; A Campi; M Rodegher; M Alberoni; G Sirabian; N Canal
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Subjective weighting of disability: an approach to quality of life assessment in rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Laman; G J Lankhorst
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Quality of life as a measure of rehabilitation outcome in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Jønsson; J Dock; M H Ravnborg
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.209

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.