Literature DB >> 7811608

Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging.

N J Pelc1, F G Sommer, K C Li, T J Brosnan, R J Herfkens, D R Enzmann.   

Abstract

Time-of-flight and phase shift methods have both been used for vascular imaging with magnetic resonance. Phase methods, and phase contrast in particular, are well suited to quantitative measurements of velocity and volume flow rate. The most robust methods for measuring flow encode through-plane velocity into phase shift and compute flow by integrating the measured velocity over the vessel lumen. The accuracy of the flow data can be degraded by the effects of acceleration and eddy currents and by partial volume effects, including the effects of finite slice thickness and resolution, pulsatile waveforms, motion, and chemical shift. The reproducibility depends on the signal-to-noise of the data and the strength of the flow encoding and can be degraded by inconsistent definition of the vessel boundary. The adjustable flow sensitivity inherent in this method is a particular asset, allowing phase contrast flow measurement to operate over a dynamic range exceeding 10(5). Recently developed rapid imaging methods are helpful in applications that would be compromised by respiratory motion. With care, excellent quantitative data can be quickly obtained in vivo, and the resulting flow information is valuable for the diagnosis and management of a variety of conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7811608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Q        ISSN: 0899-9422


  39 in total

1.  Contrast enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A E Stillman
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

2.  Validation of diffuse correlation spectroscopic measurement of cerebral blood flow using phase-encoded velocity mapping magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Erin M Buckley; Dalton Hance; Thomas Pawlowski; Jennifer Lynch; Felice B Wilson; Rickson C Mesquita; Turgut Durduran; Laura K Diaz; Mary E Putt; Daniel J Licht; Mark A Fogel; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  MRI estimation of global brain oxygen consumption rate.

Authors:  Varsha Jain; Michael C Langham; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Visualization of through-plane blood flow measurements obtained from phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Per Thunberg; Anders Kähäri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Hemodynamics: Supporting Surgical Planning in a Fontan Circulation Correction.

Authors:  Theodorus M J van Bakel; Kevin D Lau; Jennifer Hirsch-Romano; Santi Trimarchi; Adam L Dorfman; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Relationship between variations in the circle of Willis and flow rates in internal carotid and basilar arteries determined by means of magnetic resonance imaging with semiautomated lumen segmentation: reference data from 125 healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H Tanaka; N Fujita; T Enoki; K Matsumoto; Y Watanabe; K Murase; H Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer; Thomas A Hope; Murat Aksoy; Marcus T Alley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  SSFP and GRE phase contrast imaging using a three-echo readout.

Authors:  Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Interleaved balanced SSFP imaging: artifact reduction using gradient waveform grouping.

Authors:  Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics.

Authors:  C A Taylor; C A Figueroa
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.