Literature DB >> 7809806

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis.

S M Freys1, K H Fuchs, J Heimbucher, A Thiede.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was the detection of criteria that support the indication for laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients presenting with unspecific symptoms. A prospective analysis investigates the value of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain after exclusion of other pathologic findings; 58 consecutive patients were followed after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Endpoints of investigation were extent of adhesions, complications, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative quality of life. A comparison was drawn to patients following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus adhesiolysis, and conventional cholecystectomy. The results showed that major complications occurred in 10% of cases. In 45% of patients we found a complete remission, in 35% a substantial improvement, and in 20% a persistence of complaints. In a correlation between the preoperative complaints and the extent of adhesions we found small adhesions to cause recurrent abdominal pain without other symptoms while large adhesions produce recurrent abdominal pain in combination with symptoms indicative of intermittent bowel obstruction. Finally, the results of this study indicate a certain "ideal constellation" for an enduring successful adhesiolysis per laparoscopy: it is the subjective complaint of recurrent abdominal pain with a localized and reproducible punctum maximum in combination with a circumscribed area of adhesions at that site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7809806     DOI: 10.1007/bf00591051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  The frequency distribution of various pelviscopic (laparoscopic) operations, including complications rates--statistics of the Federal Republic of Germany in the years 1983-1985.

Authors:  H H Riedel; E Lehmann-Willenbrock; H Mecke; K Semm
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1989

2.  [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Initial experiences and results in 300 operations: a prospective follow-up study].

Authors:  H Troidl; W Spangenberger; A Dietrich; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Intermittent incomplete ileus of the small intestine. Sonographic diagnosis and trends].

Authors:  G Meiser; H W Waclawiczek; M Heinerman; O Boeckl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Incidence of intra-abdominal adhesions following pelviscopy and laparotomy].

Authors:  E N Tavmergen; H Mecke; K Semm
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1990

5.  [Visible control of peritoneal perforation in surgical pelviscopy].

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--what is the value of laparoscopic technique in "difficult" cases?].

Authors:  K H Fuchs; S M Freys; J Heimbucher; A Thiede
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.955

  6 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Totally laparoscopic complete resection of the remnant stomach for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Nobuyoshi Hanyu; Yujiro Tanaka; Keishiro Murakami; Atsushi Watanabe; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Functional cine MR imaging for the detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: method and surgical correlation.

Authors:  Sonja Buhmann-Kirchhoff; Reinhold Lang; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Heinrich Otto Steitz; Karl Walter Jauch; Maximilian Reiser; Andreas Lienemann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The efficacy of adhesiolysis on chronic abdominal pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonas Gerner-Rasmussen; Jakob Burcharth; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery for intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  P Reissman; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cine magnetic resonance imaging vs high-resolution ultrasonography for detection of adhesions after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a matched pair pilot analysis.

Authors:  T Mussack; T Fischer; R Ladurner; A Gangkofer; S Bensler; K K Hallfeldt; M Reiser; A Lienemann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  New adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis: a comparative study in the rabbit.

Authors:  A Tittel; K H Treutner; S Titkova; A Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Ultrapure alginate gel reduces adhesion reformation after adhesiolysis.

Authors:  Ankit A Chaturvedi; Roger M L M Lomme; Thijs Hendriks; Harry van Goor
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Cine-MRI detection of intraabdominal adhesions: correlation with intraoperative findings in 89 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Reinhold A Lang; Sonja Buhmann; Alexander Hopman; Heinrich-Otto Steitz; Andreas Lienemann; Maximilian F Reiser; Karl-Walter Jauch; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic management of recurrent adhesive small-bowel obstruction: Long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Zhi Qian Hu; Wei Jun Wang; Jian Zhang; Yi Wang; Can Ping Ruan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.