Literature DB >> 7809130

Comparisons of eukaryotic genomic sequences.

S Karlin1, I Ladunga.   

Abstract

A method for assessing genomic similarity based on relative abundances of short oligonucleotides in large DNA samples is introduced. The method requires neither homologous sequences nor prior sequence alignments. The analysis centers on (i) dinucleotide (and tri- and tetra-) relative abundance extremes in genomic sequences, (ii) distances between sequences based on all dinucleotide relative abundance values, and (iii) a multidimensional partial ordering protocol. The emphasis in this paper is on assessments of general relatedness of genomes as distinguished from phylogenetic reconstructions. Our methods demonstrate that the relative abundance distances almost always differ more for genomic interspecific sequence comparisons than for genomic intraspecific sequence comparisons, indicating congruence over different genome sequence samples. The genomic comparisons are generally concordant with accepted phylogenies among vertebrate and among fungal species sequences. Several unexpected relationships between the major groups of metazoa, fungal, and protist DNA emerge, including the following. (i) Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in dinucleotide relative abundance distances are as similar to each other as human is to bovine. (ii) S. cerevisiae, although substantially far from, is significantly closer to the vertebrates than are the invertebrates (Drosophila melanogaster, Bombyx mori, and Caenorhabditis elegans). This phenomenon may suggest variable evolutionary rates during the metazoan radiations and slower changes in the fungal divergences, and/or a polyphyletic origin of metazoa. (iii) The genomic sequences of D. melanogaster and Trypanosoma brucei are strikingly similar. This DNA similarity might be explained by some molecular adaptation of the parasite to its dipteran (tsetse fly) host, a host-parasite gene transfer hypothesis. Robustness of the methods may be due to a genomic signature of dinucleotide relative abundance values reflecting DNA structures related to dinucleotide stacking energies, constraints of DNA curvature, and mechanisms attendant to replication, repair, and recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7809130      PMCID: PMC45534          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Evolution of retroposons by acquisition or deletion of retrovirus-like genes.

Authors:  M A McClure
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Stacking energies in DNA.

Authors:  S G Delcourt; R D Blake
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence.

Authors:  K J Breslauer; R Frank; H Blöcker; L A Marky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Monophyletic origins of the metazoa: an evolutionary link with fungi.

Authors:  P O Wainright; G Hinkle; M L Sogin; S K Stickel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins.

Authors:  S L Baldauf; J D Palmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree.

Authors:  M J Novacek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Molecular evolution of herpesviruses: genomic and protein sequence comparisons.

Authors:  S Karlin; E S Mocarski; G A Schachtel
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Sequence-dependent DNA structure. The role of base stacking interactions.

Authors:  C A Hunter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Computational DNA sequence analysis.

Authors:  S Karlin; L R Cardon
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 15.500

10.  Over- and under-representation of short oligonucleotides in DNA sequences.

Authors:  C Burge; A M Campbell; S Karlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  53 in total

1.  Genome-scale compositional comparisons in eukaryotes.

Authors:  A J Gentles; S Karlin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The global intrinsic curvature of archaeal and eubacterial genomes is mostly contained in their dinucleotide composition and is probably not an adaptation.

Authors:  E Merino; A Garciarrubio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  SWORDS: a statistical tool for analysing large DNA sequences.

Authors:  Probal Chaudhuri; Sandip Das
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  RECON: a program for prediction of nucleosome formation potential.

Authors:  Victor G Levitsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Practical application of self-organizing maps to interrelate biodiversity and functional data in NGS-based metagenomics.

Authors:  Marc Weber; Hanno Teeling; Sixing Huang; Jost Waldmann; Mariette Kassabgy; Bernhard M Fuchs; Anna Klindworth; Christine Klockow; Antje Wichels; Gunnar Gerdts; Rudolf Amann; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Measuring the coding potential of genomic sequences through a combination of triplet occurrence patterns and RNY preference.

Authors:  Christoforos Nikolaou; Yannis Almirantis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  "Word" preference in the genomic text and genome evolution: different modes of n-tuplet usage in coding and noncoding sequences.

Authors:  Christoforos Nikolaou; Yannis Almirantis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Phylogenomics of nonavian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome.

Authors:  Andrew M Shedlock; Christopher W Botka; Shaying Zhao; Jyoti Shetty; Tingting Zhang; Jun S Liu; Patrick J Deschavanne; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Which bacterium is the ancestor of the animal mitochondrial genome?

Authors:  S Karlin; A M Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Heterogeneity of genomes: measures and values.

Authors:  S Karlin; I Ladunga; B E Blaisdell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.