Literature DB >> 7807554

Molecular pathways to parallel evolution: I. Gene nexuses and their morphological correlates.

E Zuckerkandl1.   

Abstract

Aspects of the regulatory interactions among genes are probably as old as most genes are themselves. Correspondingly, similar predispositions to changes in such interactions must have existed for long evolutionary periods. Features of the structure and the evolution of the system of gene regulation furnish the background necessary for a molecular understanding of parallel evolution. Patently "unrelated" organs, such as the fat body of a fly and the liver of a mammal, can exhibit fractional homology, a fraction expected to become subject to quantitation. This also seems to hold for different organs in the same organism, such as wings and legs of a fly. In informational macromolecules, on the other hand, homology is indeed all or none. In the quite different case of organs, analogy is expected usually to represent attenuated homology. Many instances of putative convergence are likely to turn out to be predominantly parallel evolution, presumably including the case of the vertebrate and cephalopod eyes. Homology in morphological features reflects a similarity in networks of active genes. Similar nexuses of active genes can be established in cells of different embryological origins. Thus, parallel development can be considered a counterpart to parallel evolution. Specific macromolecular interactions leading to the regulation of the c-fos gene are given as an example of a "controller node" defined as a regulatory unit. Quantitative changes in gene control are distinguished from relational changes, and frequent parallelism in quantitative changes is noted in Drosophila enzymes. Evolutionary reversions in quantitative gene expression are also expected. The evolution of relational patterns is attributed to several distinct mechanisms, notably the shuffling of protein domains. The growth of such patterns may in part be brought about by a particular process of compensation for "controller gene diseases," a process that would spontaneously tend to lead to increased regulatory and organismal complexity. Despite the inferred increase in gene interaction complexity, whose course over evolutionary time is unknown, the number of homology groups for the functional and structural protein units designated as domains has probably remained rather constant, even as, in some of its branches, evolution moved toward "higher" organisms. In connection with this process, the question is raised of parallel evolution within the purview of activating and repressing master switches and in regard to the number of levels into which the hierarchies of genic master switches will eventually be resolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7807554     DOI: 10.1007/bf00160412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  87 in total

Review 1.  On the architecture of regulatory systems: evolutionary insights and implications.

Authors:  W J Dickinson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Evolutionary biology. The eye in a twinkling.

Authors:  R Dawkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the evolution of eyes: would you like it simple or compound?

Authors:  C S Zuker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The yeast transcription activator PRTF, a homolog of the mammalian serum response factor, is encoded by the MCM1 gene.

Authors:  E E Jarvis; K L Clark; G F Sprague
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Transcription factor p91 interacts with the epidermal growth factor receptor and mediates activation of the c-fos gene promoter.

Authors:  X Y Fu; J J Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene.

Authors:  J J Zhao; R A Lazzarini; L Pick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Functional analysis of a growth factor-responsive transcription factor complex.

Authors:  C S Hill; R Marais; S John; J Wynne; S Dalton; R Treisman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-04-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Imprinting a determined state into the chromatin of Drosophila.

Authors:  R Paro
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs.

Authors:  W R Moyle; R K Campbell; R V Myers; M P Bernard; Y Han; X Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Serum response element associated transcription factors in mouse embryos: serum response factor, YY1, and PEA3 factor.

Authors:  S H Liu; B H Peng; J T Ma; Y C Liu; S Y Ng
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1995
View more
  9 in total

1.  The sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) of the sponge Neofibularia nolitangere: implications for the molecular evolution of SNBPs.

Authors:  J Ausió; M L Van Veghel; R Gomez; D Barreda
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  The role of constrained self-organization in genome structural evolution.

Authors:  R von Sternberg
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.774

Review 3.  Neutral and nonneutral mutations: the creative mix--evolution of complexity in gene interaction systems.

Authors:  E Zuckerkandl
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Squid Pax-6 and eye development.

Authors:  S I Tomarev; P Callaerts; L Kos; R Zinovieva; G Halder; W Gehring; J Piatigorsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Adaptive evolution of cytochrome c oxidase: Infrastructure for a carnivorous plant radiation.

Authors:  Richard W Jobson; Rasmus Nielsen; Liisa Laakkonen; Mårten Wikström; Victor A Albert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Emerging Frontiers in the Study of Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  David A Liberles; Belinda Chang; Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Aaron Goldman; Jody Hey; Betül Kaçar; Michelle Meyer; William Murphy; David Posada; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Glutathione S-transferase and S-crystallins of cephalopods: evolution from active enzyme to lens-refractive proteins.

Authors:  S I Tomarev; S Chung; J Piatigorsky
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Parallel evolution controlled by adaptation and covariation in ammonoid cephalopods.

Authors:  Claude Monnet; Kenneth De Baets; Christian Klug
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Highly conserved elements discovered in vertebrates are present in non-syntenic loci of tunicates, act as enhancers and can be transcribed during development.

Authors:  Remo Sanges; Yavor Hadzhiev; Marion Gueroult-Bellone; Agnes Roure; Marco Ferg; Nicola Meola; Gabriele Amore; Swaraj Basu; Euan R Brown; Marco De Simone; Francesca Petrera; Danilo Licastro; Uwe Strähle; Sandro Banfi; Patrick Lemaire; Ewan Birney; Ferenc Müller; Elia Stupka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 16.971

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.