Literature DB >> 7807034

Cancer screening and detection in family practice: a MIRNET study.

D J Triezenberg1, M A Smith, T M Holmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of effective strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer is a high priority for the nation, yet relatively little is known about how cancer is diagnosed in primary care. This study was undertaken to describe practitioner beliefs about cancer screening and to determine whether beliefs and intentions about cancer screening are associated with actual cancer detection rates among asymptomatic patients cared for by family physicians.
METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire on cancer screening beliefs and practices was completed by members of the Michigan Research Network (MIRNET) in January 1990 and again in December of 1990. Thirty-one practitioners prospectively identified all patients with a new diagnosis of cancer during 1990.
RESULTS: One hundred sixteen cancer cases were identified. Only 31% of the 77 cancers considered to be potentially detectable by routine screening were actually identified by screening. Physicians reporting more aggressive screening practices identified greater percentages of asymptomatic cancers and a greater number of breast and colon cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Low percentages of cancers were detected in asymptomatic patients in this population. Practitioner attitudes about the need for cancer screening appear to be an important component of cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7807034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  5 in total

1.  Research interests of physicians in two practice-based primary care research networks.

Authors:  M S Croughan-Minihane; D H Thom; D B Petitti
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-01

2.  Timeliness and quality of diagnostic care for medicare recipients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Craig C Earle; Lysa S Magazu; Jennifer R Brown; Bridget A Neville; Nathanael D Hevelone; Lisa C Richardson; Gregory A Abel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Who has screening mammography? Results from the 1994-1995 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  F Tudiver; E Fuller-Thomson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Diagnostic delay and complications for older adults with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Gregory A Abel; Lysa S Magazu; Bridget A Neville; Lisa C Richardson; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2009-03

5.  Why don't family physicians follow clinical practice guidelines for cancer screening? Family Physician Study Group, Sociobehavioral Cancer Research Network, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  F Tudiver; C Herbert; V Goel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.