Literature DB >> 10463090

Who has screening mammography? Results from the 1994-1995 National Population Health Survey.

F Tudiver1, E Fuller-Thomson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of Canadian women aged 35 to 49 who receive screening mammograms not recommended by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of the 1994-1995 National Population Health Survey.
SETTING: Patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: From a full national representative sample of 17,626 Canadian residents, we selected 2053 women aged 35 to 49 with no breast problems. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, education, employment status, marital status, immigrant status, region of residence, self-reported health status, having a regular doctor, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and having a confidant.
RESULTS: Of the 2053 women in the sample, 825 (40.2%) had had a screening mammogram as part of a regular medical checkup; 1228 (59.8%) had never had one. Logistic analysis showed that respondents who were approaching age 50, had higher incomes, lived in Quebec, and had regular medical doctors were more likely to have screening mammograms. Statistical trends indicated that heavy drinkers were less likely and immigrants more likely to have mammograms (not significant at P < .01: P = .012 and P = .02, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Most of these findings are consistent with those of other studies of women 50 and younger. The findings suggest that the patient variables associated with having mammograms in those younger than 50 might be similar to those in women older than 50. An important next step is to determine whether this pattern of use has more to do with younger patients' demand for screening or with physicians' ordering of tests. Further research is also needed to understand the dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship in this situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10463090      PMCID: PMC2328187     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  31 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening: who should be included?

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Use of written cases to study factors associated with regional variations in referral rates.

Authors:  G R Langley; D L Tritchler; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; J E Till
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

Authors:  K C Stange; R Kelly; J Chao; S J Zyzanski; J C Shank; C R Jaén; J Melnikow; S Flocke
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Why do some women get regular mammograms?

Authors:  B K Rimer; B Trock; P F Engstrom; C Lerman; E King
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The decision to suggest screening lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: the effect of training.

Authors:  W J Crump; C E Marquiss; P J Pierce; T Phelps
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Physician compliance with mammography guidelines: barriers and enhancers.

Authors:  M E Costanza; A M Stoddard; J G Zapka; V P Gaw; R Barth
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

7.  Determinants of preventive practices in fee-for-service primary care.

Authors:  R N Battista; J I Williams; L A MacFarlane
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Cancer screening by primary care physicians. Can we explain the differences?

Authors:  E H Osborn; J A Bird; S J McPhee; J E Rodnick; D Fordham
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Obstacles to family practitioners' use of screening tests: determinants of practice?

Authors:  K A Resnicow; M Schorow; H G Bloom; R Massad
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patients' wishes are very important.

Authors:  M Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Determinants of a healthy lifestyle and use of preventive screening in Canada.

Authors:  Vikky Qi; Susan P Phillips; Wilma M Hopman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Health Care Utilization by Canadian Women.

Authors:  Arminée Kazanjian; Denise Morettin; Robert Cho
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.