BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread view that important clinical and etiologic differences exist between histologic categories of lung cancer, few studies have examined the accuracy of hospital-reported pathologic diagnoses of lung cancer. METHODS: A review of pathologic material and an assessment of survival patterns were conducted in conjunction with a recently completed case-control study of lung cancer among nonsmoking women in Missouri. Using established protocols, tissue slides from tumors of 482 patients were reviewed by 3 pathologists. RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type among former smokers and lifetime nonsmokers. The overall agreement rate between the original and review diagnoses was 65.6%. The positive predictive value ranged from 0.33 for bronchioalveolar carcinomas to 0.84 for adenocarcinomas. Agreement rates for small, medium, and large hospitals were 63.1, 66.6, and 66.2%, respectively. Survival rates were highest for bronchioalveolar carcinoma and lowest for small cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Given the importance of lung cancer to public health and the need to examine risk by histologic type, these data indicate that pathologic review of registry-reported lung cancer cases may be an important component of large scale studies of etiology.
BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread view that important clinical and etiologic differences exist between histologic categories of lung cancer, few studies have examined the accuracy of hospital-reported pathologic diagnoses of lung cancer. METHODS: A review of pathologic material and an assessment of survival patterns were conducted in conjunction with a recently completed case-control study of lung cancer among nonsmoking women in Missouri. Using established protocols, tissue slides from tumors of 482 patients were reviewed by 3 pathologists. RESULTS:Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type among former smokers and lifetime nonsmokers. The overall agreement rate between the original and review diagnoses was 65.6%. The positive predictive value ranged from 0.33 for bronchioalveolar carcinomas to 0.84 for adenocarcinomas. Agreement rates for small, medium, and large hospitals were 63.1, 66.6, and 66.2%, respectively. Survival rates were highest for bronchioalveolar carcinoma and lowest for small cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Given the importance of lung cancer to public health and the need to examine risk by histologic type, these data indicate that pathologic review of registry-reported lung cancer cases may be an important component of large scale studies of etiology.
Authors: Heather A Wakelee; Ellen T Chang; Scarlett L Gomez; Theresa H Keegan; Diane Feskanich; Christina A Clarke; Lars Holmberg; Lee C Yong; Laurence N Kolonel; Michael K Gould; Dee W West Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Gawełko; Marek Cierpiał-Wolan; Second Bwanakare; Michalina Czarnota Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: A Marchetti; S Pellegrini; G Sozzi; G Bertacca; P Gaeta; F Buttitta; V Carnicelli; P Griseri; A Chella; C A Angeletti; M Pierotti; G Bevilacqua Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 7.640