Literature DB >> 7804590

Non-penetrating corneal foreign body injuries: factors affecting delay in rehabilitation of patients.

D G Jayamanne1, R W Bell.   

Abstract

A review of 783 patients with non-penetrating, superficial corneal foreign bodies (FBs), indicated that delay in rehabilitation was related to two factors: (1) the size of the abrasion following removal of the FB, larger abrasions requiring longer duration of antibiotic ointment, and (2) inadequate removal of corneal rust. Allergy to chloramphenicol 1% ointment (5.5 in 1000), commonly used in the management of corneal abrasions, is unpredictable and can also impair rapid rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7804590      PMCID: PMC1342432          DOI: 10.1136/emj.11.3.195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med        ISSN: 1351-0622


  4 in total

1.  Removal of corneal foreign bodies.

Authors:  J A Reich
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1990-05

2.  Efficacy of eyepad in corneal healing after corneal foreign body removal.

Authors:  M F Hulbert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The corneoscleral limbus in human corneal epithelial wound healing.

Authors:  H S Dua; J V Forrester
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  No eye pad for corneal abrasion.

Authors:  J N Kirkpatrick; H B Hoh; S D Cook
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.